02/23/2000 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

:rA{ Mashpee Zoning Minutes—February 23 2000 4 Board of Appeals The excavator cleared the property and installed the foundation. A new plan was drawn showing that the foundation had been incorrectly installed because some of the stakes on the lot were missing. The applicant is seeking a 9-foot sideline Variance. ' r No comments were received from abutters. " r*r , tMr. Borgeson moved to grant a Variance of nine feet from the sideline setback '; r { requirements, subject to criteria: 2, 3, 4 and findings: 3. Ms. Elizenberry seconded. All agree Ili d. 4 A I; �' r• Jeffrey R. & Sheila A. E denberg—Request a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the sideline setback requirements to allow for additions to an existing dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 43 Kim Path Pat (Map 117 Block 90)Mashpee,MA. r � t Jeffrey R. & Sheila A. Eydenbera—Request a Special Permit under Section 174-17 of " the Zoning By-laws for permission to expand a pre-existing,non-conforming dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 43 Kim Path(Map 117 Block 90) Mashpee, MA. r Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, Frederick R. Borgeson and Richard T. Guerrera. Mr. John Slavinsky of Cape & Islands Engineering represented the applicants and stated that the existing dwelling is two feet away from the property line. The proposal calls for the removal of the existing deck and construction of a 14x 12-foot addition that will be four feet from the property line. Another proposed addition of 11x17 feet will conform to the setback requirements. The existing garage will become part of the house and the four-bedroom home will be reduced to a three-bedroom home. A new septic system will p' R also be installed. The lot coverage will decrease by 1.2%with the proposal. '' Mrs. Kent and her son, Brian Kent who is an abutter, attended the meeting. They expressed concern with the proposal blocking their waterview. Mr. Slavinsky stated that the applicant is not proposing a second floor to the existing one-floor dwelling. Mrs. Kent and her son had no objection to the project. No other comments were received from M. . abutters. Mr. Borgeson moved to grant a Variance of 11 feet on the easterly sideline, subject to , criteria: 1, 2, 3, 4 and findings: 1, 3, 4 and upgrade of new septic system. Mr. Govoni seconded. All agreed. Mr. Borgeson moved to grant the Special Permit, subject to criteria/findings: 1, 5, 6, 7, Goldhirsch case. Mr. Guerrera seconded. All agreed. awl r i�r� John B. &Elaine Wilson—Request a Special Permit under Section 174-20 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to demolish an existing structure and build a