Laserfiche WebLink
r a <br /> Mashpee Zoning Minutes=June 14, 2000 3 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> Mr. David Sanicki of Cape & Islands Engineering represented the application and , . <br /> submitted the returned certified receipts from the Waterways Commission,the Shellfisht ,. <br /> Constable and the Harbormaster. He stated that the Conservation Commission approved ;u M <br /> construction of the house on the subject lot approximately eight months ago. A staircase <br /> along the bank with a pier, ramp and float is proposed. No Variance is being requested. q 'r <br /> The Conservation Commission has approved the project. ■ <br /> I��If <br /> No comments were received from abutters. d <br /> Mr. Borgeson moved to grant the Special Permit, subject to findings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Mr. ASI' <br /> Nelson seconded. All agreed. <br /> 4•a1i <br /> CONTINUED HEARINGS <br /> Out of consideration for the applicant's lengthy commute from Boston,Mr. Govoni <br /> requested that the Board take this hearing out of order. <br /> oj4s�l�i,1` <br /> Stephen M. & Sarah Daley—Request a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By- <br /> laws for permission to vary the side and front setback requirements to allow for , <br /> construction of a deck to an existing dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning <br /> district at 219 Waterway(Map 111 Block 74)Mashpee, MA. <br /> 400 <br /> Continued from April 26, 2000 to allow applicant opportunity to submit engineered <br /> plans. On May 10, 2000, The Board received a letter from the applicant requesting that <br /> the Board grant a Variance,pending delivery of the certified plan to the Board. The <br /> Board voted unanimously to deny the request and to continue the hearing until June 14, ; . <br /> 2000. <br /> d <br /> pub <br /> Sitting: James E. Regan III, Robert G.Nelson and Richard T. Guerrera. <br /> Mr. Daley represented his application and stated that he is requesting a Variance to allow <br /> for construction of a deck because his lot is surrounded on three sides by streets. A <br /> setback of 30 feet is required from the street. Mr. Daley said that the existing deck was ' <br /> granted a Variance 12 years ago. <br /> Mr.Nelson checked the plan for the exact setback figures of the proposed construction <br /> .N!,r <br /> and discovered that the plan shows the existing dwelling is 25.7' from the street. Mr. <br /> Regan suggested that the Board grant a Variance for the existing dwelling for the 11`V0I�0.. <br /> applicant's protection. 0 <br /> 'elY rA <br /> No comments were received from abutters. p <br /> Mr.Nelson moved to grant the following: <br /> 1. a Variance of 4.3 feet from Waterway to the existing dwelling. <br /> 2. a Variance of 15.5 feet from Waterway to the proposed deck. M <br /> III' <br /> IE ' <br /> e y <br />