My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/10/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
01/10/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2022 2:03:26 PM
Creation date
2/22/2022 2:01:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning Minutes—January 10, 2001 7 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> opportunity to research if 1987 ZBA Decision to Deny was recorded at the Barnstable <br /> County Registry of Deeds. <br /> Sitting: Robert G.Nelson, Richard T. Guerrera and Zella E. Elizenberry. Messrs. Regan <br /> and Govoni stepped down and left the room. <br /> Attorney Thomas H. Souza of Carter and Associates represented the Petition. The Board <br /> reviewed letters from abutters opposed to the proposal that were submitted just before the <br /> meeting started. <br /> Attorney Souza conducted research at the Barnstable County Registry of Deeds and <br /> submitted copies of Transfer Certificate of Title and the Deerfield Acres Declaration of <br /> Al Covenants Restricting and Protecting Open Areas. <br /> 4f4 <br /> P <br /> Mr. Nelson questioned if it was normal procedure for Town Hall records to be included <br /> in a Title Search. Attorney Souza replied that a Title Search would normally require a <br /> { search at the Registry. <br /> 4 <br /> Attorney Souza submitted copies of letter from the Planning Board approving the <br /> subdivision with a standard covenant and a release of that covenant. All the lots in the <br /> subdivision, with the exception of Lot 15, are considered buildable lots. The subject lot <br /> has been assessed as a buildable lot and there are two betterments on the lot. <br /> Mr. Nelson conducted his own research of the subdivision and stated that there are four <br /> developed lots with 60 feet of frontage each. The Petitioner is requesting only a 5-foot <br /> Variance from the frontage requirements to allow for construction of a single-family <br /> home on the subject lot. <br /> k« Ms. Shaw, an abutter, said that Mr. Stuart Bornstein was the developer of the subdivision. <br /> x <br /> She said that because Mr. Bornstein was denied a Variance on the subject property, the <br /> current owner should be denied. Ms. Shaw also said that property owners in the area <br /> bought their homes because they thought the subject lot was unbuildable. <br /> f <br /> Y Mr. Wheeler indicated that the subdivision is a cluster subdivision, non-special permit. <br /> Mr. Banks, the potential buyer of the subject lot, hired Mr. Mackenzie, zoning consultant, <br /> to conduct research on the subject lot. Mr. MacKenzie stated that the subdivision was <br /> developed by Messrs. Casey and Powers and was approved as a cluster subdivision, <br /> non-special permit, with a definitive plan in August 1972. The plan signed by the <br /> ;A <br /> Planning Board on October 18, 1972 stated that the approval was unconditional, except <br /> for any notations on the Plan. The notations on the plan included the Covenant and that <br /> Lot 15 is an unbuildable lot. The subject lot is #30 on the subdivision plan. <br /> Mr. MacKenzie stated that the subject lot is a buildable lot and that the Zoning By-law <br /> change in Chapter 40A, Section 6,protects the lot. He said that Mrs. Bornstein was the <br /> owner of the subject lot and conveyed all the lots in her possession. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.