02/14/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decisions

Home Browse Search

I i Mashpee Zoning CSC Group Nominee Trust 2 Board of Appeals V-01-22-1 through V-01-22-28 Ms. Dulce Bryan, an abutter, said that the proposal would be "ruining your l two-acre zoning" and"crowds your schools and crowds your roads" and that it "destroys the whole intent of zoning". !!' Mr. Paul Avrett, an abutter, agreed with Ms. Ryan's comments. He said that I� there is already a lot of traffic in the area and that constructing 28 more homes in the area would only add to the congestion. Ms. Shirley Nurse Peters, an abutter, also objected to the proposal J p sal and said that p the Petitioner should have done his homework prior to his Petition and should not now be asking for relief due to financial hardship because of the Growth Management By-law. I ; Mr. Regan suggested to the abutters that they keep in mind that many cluster subdivisions exist in Town that are significantly more dense that the proposed Lowell Road subdivision. Members of the Board expressed a need to peruse the Cape Cod Commission document and voted unanimous) to continue the Petition until March 28 2001 Y , At the continued hearings on March 28, 2001,Mr. Regan announced that this is a I Chapter 112 Hearing. I i ! Attorney Peter M. Daigle represented the Petition and stated that the 33-acre ! I parcel completed an exhaustive one-year review process with the Cape Cod Commission. Members of the Board confirmed that they had thoroughly examined the Cape Cod Commission Lowell Road Subdivision DRI Decision document and that the Decision demands numerous conditions and restrictions on the proposal that would benefit and protect the Town's interests. No comments were received from abutters. GENERAL FINDINGS I 1. that the subject property is located at the intersection of Lowell Road and Great Neck Road North and consists of over 33 acres. VARIANCE CRITERIA Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the petitioner. 1 SPECIFIC FINDINGS The Board determined that: 1. the Planning Board, Town Planner, Mashpee Environmental Coalition and the Water District have approved the proposal.