Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning Peter R. & Carolie D. Owens V-01-78 2 <br /> Board of Appeals <br /> ;t <br /> No comments were received from abutters. <br /> The Board expressed concern with the proposed construction being so close to the <br /> streetline. <br /> The Board voted unanimously to continue the Petition until August 8, 2001 to <br /> y allow Mr. Slavinsky an opportunity to provide more information on the abutting homes <br /> and their distance from the streetline and for clarification of the New Seabury Special <br /> Permit area. <br /> } At the continued Public Hearings on August 8, 2001, Mr. John Slavinsky of Cape <br /> s & Islands Engineering represented the Petition and referred to the revised plans. Mr. <br /> Slavinsky said that the Petitioner bought the subject property under the impression that it <br /> F' was in the Special Permit area and that the property was exempt from the current Zoning <br /> is <br /> .m By-laws. He stated that other homes in the area are closer to the streetline than the <br /> proposed construction and that the subject lot has an unusual shape and topography. <br /> Mr. Brem visited the subject property and stated that the proposal would be <br /> detrimental to the area and may cause problems with the neighbors. He expressed <br /> surprise that no abutters have voiced opposition to the proposal. Mr. Borgeson said that <br /> he also visited the subject property. <br /> After some discussion, Mr. Slavinsky requested a Withdrawal Without Prejudice <br /> of the above-referenced Petition for a Variance, V-01-78. <br /> The Board voted unanimously to accept the Request for Withdrawal Without <br /> Prejudice of the above-referenced Petition. <br />