08/08/2001 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Minutes—August 8, 2001 2 Board of Appeals fMrs. Williams represented her Petition and stated that the Variance granted by the Board on the subject lot in 1998 has lapsed. She is seeking Variance relief from the lot size requirements to allow for the sale of the lot. z w: ii { No comments were received from abutters. Mr. Regan moved to grant the following: • a Variance of 55,138 square feet from the lot size requirements. • a Variance of 42.81 feet from the frontage requirements. fb The Variance is subject to same findings as V-98-131 and plan J#51732A, dated 10/28/98. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. rX Peter R. & Carolie D. Owens—Request Special Permit under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to expand apre-existing, non-conforming structure to allow for construction of a garage and an addition to the structure on property located 4: in an R-3 zoning district at 16 Spoondrift Circle (Map 111 Parcel 118) Mashpee, MA. Gt` Continued from 7/25/01 Public Hearings to allow for engineer to conduct research concerning the New Seabury Special Permit area and the distance of abutting homes from the street line. } Peter R. & Carolie D. Owens—Request a Variance from Sections 174-31 and 174-33 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the side, front and lot coverage requirements and the setback requirements to water and wetlands to allow for construction of a garage and an addition to a pre-existing, non-conforming structure on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 16 Spoondrift Circle (Map 111 Parcel 118) Mashpee, MA. Continued from 7/25/01 Public Hearings to allow for engineer to conduct research concerning the z New Seabury Special Permit area and the distance of abutting homes from the street line. F� �z Fy. Sitting: Edward M. Govoni, James E. Regan III and Richard T. Guerrera. Mr. John Slavinsky of Cape & Islands Engineering represented the Petitions and referred to the revised plans. Mr. Brem visited the subject property and said that the proposal would be detrimental to the area and may cause problems with the neighbors. He said that the houses and lots are very small and very close to each other. Mr. Borgeson said that he also visited the subject property and that the proposal seems to be low profile. Mr. Slavinsky said that the hardship is that the Petitioner bought the property under the F impression that it was in the Special Permit area, exempting the lot from current zoning By-laws. He stated that other homes in the area are closer to the street line than the proposed construction. Mr. Slavinsky said that the lot has an unusual shape and topography. After some discussion, Mr. Slavinsky requested a Withdrawal Without Prejudice of the above-referenced Petitions. The Board voted unanimously to accept the request.