Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Board of Appeals -2- October 29, 1999 <br /> Commission under a Notice of Intent application for <br /> permission to construct a 3 bedroom house. <br /> We have met with Conservation Commission staff, and <br /> attended a public hearing for the proposed house. In order <br /> to gain approval for the proposed house, we have designed the <br /> house location to conform to the minimum standards of both <br /> the local wetlands regulations and the state wetlands <br /> regulations. These minimum standards require a minimum <br /> setback of 35' from the limit of work and the construction. <br /> Conformance with the minimum standards of the wetlands <br /> regulations places the house less than 40 feet from the front <br /> property line and in violation of section 174-31 . <br /> The Conservation Commission voted to approve the <br /> proposed house and associated construction shown on the plan <br /> conditioned upon approval of a variance from the Board of <br /> DO Appeals. <br /> Parcel 40 is located in a subdivision that was created <br /> D prior to the current setback requirements of section 174-31 . <br /> Many, if not all houses in this neighborhood do not and can <br /> not conform to these requirements . Parcel 40 is one of the <br /> only remaining undeveloped lots in the subdivision. <br /> If the variance requested is not granted, a substantial <br /> hardship will result to the owner. The lot was created for <br /> the purpose of a residential house. If the lot cannot <br /> accommodate a residential house, the value of the lot will be <br /> greatly diminished thus resulting in a substantial financial <br /> hardship to the owner. <br /> The proposed house is modest in size by today' s <br /> standards, the house was specifically designed to fit as <br /> practically as possible on this lot. Construction of a house <br /> in this location will not cause any additional detriment to <br /> the surrounding neighborhood than a house that was in strict <br /> conformance with the zoning by-law. The proposed house meets <br /> the minimum setbacks from both side property lines as well as <br /> the rear property line. <br /> The property across the street is vacant. Construction <br /> of a house on Parcel 40 will therefore not impact on any <br /> views of vistas to the abutting pond. In fact, strict <br /> compliance with the front yard setback would place the house <br /> in the same view lines as the proposed house. <br />