Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeals Gary Locarno - V-98-68 2. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> A. General <br /> 1. the subject property is located at 51 Waterline Drive South(Map 120, Block <br /> 145) and contains 21,776 square feet. <br /> 2. the immediate neighborhood consists of single family homes of similar size, <br /> 3. the subject property is located in the Little Neck Bay cluster subdivision <br /> approved in 1974. The zoning requires a 30 foot front setback, 15 foot side <br /> setback and allows 30% lot coverage. <br /> 4. the proposed location of the house will result in a front setback of 30,37 feet <br /> and a side setback on the northerly side of 9.01 feet. Lot coverage of 27% of <br /> the upland area conforms to zoning. <br /> 5. the rear of the lot borders on Great River and the lot is impacted by wetlands. <br /> B. Variance Criteria <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the by-laws would <br /> involve hardship. <br /> C, Specific Findings <br /> I. the shape and topography of the lot with the substantial wetland area at the <br /> rear create a hardship in the placement of a house on the lot. <br /> 2. the applicant has maintained the 50 foot buffer requirement from the wetlands <br /> and has redesigned the house and eliminated an entry porch. <br /> 3. the applicant has received the approval of the Conservation Conunission for <br /> the final plans. <br /> 4. the topography and shape affect this lot and not the zoning district in which it <br /> is located. <br /> 5. the Board determined that desirable relief may be granted without derogating <br /> from the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-laws and without detriment to <br /> the public good. <br /> In view of the foregoing, the Mashpee Board of Appeals found that the applicant <br /> met the criteria necessary for the granting of a Variance. Upon motion duly made and <br /> seconded, the Board of Appeals voted unanimously on April 22, 1998 to grant a variance <br /> to allow a setback of 9.01 feet on the northerly side, The Variance is conditioned upon <br /> compliance with plans of Michael H, Grotzke dated March 10, 1998. <br />