My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/25/1995 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01/25/1995 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2022 3:07:39 PM
Creation date
2/28/2022 3:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Appeals Minutes - January 25, 1995 3. <br />E <br />• had acted on the complaints about the building. He said people <br />were not aware that the if the variance request was granted <br />they would have a full horse barn in a residential neighborhood. <br />He said it does not belong in a residential neighborhood. <br />Chris Widner: direct abutter. She asked Mr. Costa if he lived <br />in the neighborhood and he said he did not. She said she saw <br />no problem with the horse barn. She purchased her lot and built <br />so that they could see the horse barn and stated that she thinks <br />it is an attribute to the neighborhood. She said she would <br />provide a letter from other neighbors in favor of the Lapios. <br />George Costa: He said he was speaking as a former member of <br />the Board of Health. <br />Leon Proverb: a direct abutter. He said he has lived there <br />three years and that the children love it and the grounds are <br />maintained daily. <br />Mr. Kirrane: He said that he did not believe that Chapter 40A <br />Section 7 requires continuous 6 years. If there was a zoning <br />violation for 6 or more years and no action has been brought <br />to enforce the by-law no action can be taken now. He said that <br />the earlier complaints could have been addressed by the town <br />• or the aggrieved residents had the right to file a lawsuit within <br />the 6 year period. He said that abutters and abutters to the <br />abutters within 300' feet are notified and, in this case,. some <br />of the abutters were in Sandwich. He said Mr. Costa's brother's <br />property was beyond the 300' and he questioned if he would have <br />been considered an aggrieved person. <br />Mr. Kirrane said that the Board of Health had requested a legal <br />opinion on this property in 1988 and commended the owners on the <br />cleanliness. <br />Mr. Costa: asked if only the abutters could complain. He was <br />told no. He said the building permits say they are not supposed <br />to have that use. <br />Mr. Kirrane agreed and said the violation commenced in 1984 <br />and had to have been acted upon within 6 years. <br />Jennifer Martin: a Mashpee resident. She asked how the Board <br />defined "barn". Mr. Kirrane said the existing by-law permits <br />the raising and housing of livestock on less than 5 acres <br />in every zoning district upon the grant of a Special Permit. <br />He said he did not think they needed it because they have a <br />pre-existing use. <br />Michael Makunas: a Mashpee resident and former member of the <br />Board of Appeals. Said he could vouch for the history of the <br />letters and complaints on the property. He said the issue was <br />meeting requirements for a Variance to legalize the property. <br />Mr. Regan moved to take the petition under advisement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.