10/25/1995 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Board of Appeals Minutes - October 25, 1995 He suggested the owner was due at least 3 lots. Mr. Govoni explained that there may be new zoning changes proposed for the May Town Meeting. Mr. Slavinsky asked for a recess which was granted. The hearing resumed after the Asdourian hearing. Ms. Stankowski asked if the Board could approve three lots and Mr. Govoni explained that the hearing was advertised for two lots only. He said that the Briarwood Assoc. had no objection to two lots. Mr. Govoni explained that the original zoning only protected three lots and that owners with four contiguous lots had to combine them. Mr. Regan stated that developers knew that the lots should be held in separate names but many owners did not realize this. Mr. Regan moved to continue the hearing to December 13. Ms. Hawver seconded. All agreed. George K. and Christine G. Asdourian - Request a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the setback and lot coverage requirements in an R- 3 zoning district on property located at 62 Tide Run (Map 125, Block 206) Masbpee, MA. The applicants propose to construct a swimming pool 7' from the rear property line and a shed 8.3' from the side property line. • Members sitting: E. Govoni, J. Regan, R Nelson Engineer Michael Grotzke represented the applicant and explained that the lot borders reserve land. The Board noted that the driveway encroached on the reserve land. Mr. Nelson explained that the shape of the pool required additional space over a conventional pool. Mr. Govoni explained that the proposal was similar to many in the neighborhood and would not be a detriment. Mr. Regan moved to grant a Variance of 13' in the rear setback and a right setback of 6.7' and a lot coverage increase of 0.8%. Mr. Nelson seconded. All agreed. The Board noted that the Decision should read that the plans of the pool are accepted but the encroachment of the driveway was not approved. Bernard & Zelda Pemstein The Board was informed that Thomas Demelio, builder, had Sled a Variance application for the Pemsteins for a sideline setback. After the submission of new engineer's plans, the Building Inspector determined that a Variance was not needed and Mr. Demelio was filing a withdrawal request. Mr. Nelson moved to grant the withdrawal without prejudice. Mr. Regan seconded. Mr. Govoni agreed.