Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeals Henry D. and Lisa M. Demers V-94-17 2 . <br /> The Board of Appeals made the following findings: <br /> 1 . the topography of the lot with the area of wetland <br /> is an unusual one in the subdivision <br /> 2 . the proposed location is the only place on the lot <br /> where a home could be constructed to maximize the <br /> distance from the wetland <br /> 3 . the proposed location would encroach only 10 feet <br /> on the front yard setback and conforms to all <br /> other setback requirements and is consistent with <br /> the setbacks of neighboring properties . <br /> The Board determined that, owing to the unique <br /> topography of the lot, a literal enforcement of the front <br /> yard setback requirements of the by-law would involve <br /> substantial financial hardship to the petitioner and that <br /> the front yard setback may be reduced to 30 feet without <br /> substantially derogating from the intent of the by-law and <br /> without substantial detriment to the public good. <br /> Upon motion duly made and seconded the Board of <br /> Appeals voted unanimously on March 9, 1994 to grant the <br /> Variance of 10 feet allowing for a 30 foot front setback. <br /> The Variance is referenced by plans of New Seabury <br /> Engineering ated January 18 , 1994 . <br /> 4 <br /> = - 3 <br /> `�.`` c am E 3 ° n om 652 . <br /> V1 D Q O ?u3 ¢apo° ..9 = m? c° ° E=3 O= 02 I <br /> aZ6yF 41§ V�_m vl <br /> < T ny0 oO<'L 'J n39S9-. 413 <br /> _E <br /> 3 <br /> g= <br /> e +>• c 3 u E E <br /> ` � ° m of uLgejLo = °itin a` <br />