Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />DECISION FOR A VARIANCE <br />Owners, Louis Pinheiro and Maria M. Pinheirc <br />75 Sunset Circle (Map 64 Parcel 8) <br />Mashpee MA 02649 <br />V-2021-58 <br />The property has been improved with a 3-bedroom ranch style single-family residential <br />structure and fails to meet the 15 ft. side yard setback from its northerly property line where <br />the deck is only 8.9 ft. and the dwelling is 11.1 ft. from the property line. The dwelling also <br />does not conform to the 40 ft. front yard setback, but meets the average setbacks of the <br />structures on either side and is considered to be conforming. The application is for Special <br />Permit relief for an alteration or extension of a pre-existing non -conforming structure. <br />The proposed Variance relief was applied for because of the 8.3 ft. from the southerly <br />property line. Therefore the applicants are seeking a 6.7 ft. variance from that line. The <br />Board has the discretion to grant variance relief if the applicant can demonstrate that a <br />hardship exists due to the shape and topography, and other soil conditions on the lot, and <br />will not nullify the intent of the bylaw. In this particular case the site plan demonstrates a <br />significant change in the angle of the lot line to the South thereby rendering the front <br />portion of the lot narrower than the rear portion of the lot near John's Pond. <br />The Board has the discretion to approve the project with conditions upon approval from <br />the Conservation Commission and/or if any changes to the plan would require a refiling <br />with the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br />Chairman Furbush asked what the additions include. Attorney Kirrane said that the <br />additions include a second floor to the main dwelling and above the garage. The structure <br />remains a 3-bedroom dwelling. Mr. Furbush agreed that the lot is odd in shape. <br />Mr. Goldstein questioned the variance request. Attorney Kirrane said that the application <br />does not include the front yard setback because it meets the average setbacks on both sides. <br />There is a slight bump -out in the front, however the question really becomes whether or <br />not it is getting closer than the average setbacks, but the fact that it is an average setback <br />and not meeting the 40 ft. setback makes it a non -conforming condition. The question is <br />does this require a variance or is it a non -conforming condition even though it's an allowed <br />condition because it meets the average setbacks. The Board can include this as part of the <br />Special Permit for alteration or change. <br />GENERAL CRITERIA <br />The subject property located at 75 Sunset Circle is approximately 15,148 square feet. <br />There were two abutter letters read into the record who are in favor of the project. <br />The Board read the comments submitted by the Conservation Department and Board of <br />Health into the record. <br />There were no more comments from the Board. <br />2 <br />