My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/23/2022 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
02/23/2022 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2023 2:42:37 PM
Creation date
3/11/2022 3:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/23/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> FEBRUARY 23,2022 <br /> The Building Inspector had raised a couple of issues which the Attorney does not recall, <br /> but believes those issues were addressed. There were concerns raised on the height of the <br /> building, but a "stop work order" was never issued on the building, and after the <br /> construction of the frame, the building was completed. <br /> Attorney Kirrane provided photographs of the building that has several roof lines based <br /> upon dormers that run front to back on the entire structure. There is also a widow's walk. <br /> Attorney Kirrane understands the Board's concerns relative to height relief and he <br /> explained that to the contractor. There's a problem that the building exceeds the height <br /> restriction by 1.8 ft. and the remedy would be the removal of the roof or to seek Variance <br /> relief from the Board. Attorney Kirrane does not cast any blame on anyone, but it would <br /> have been better if a stop work order had been issued.Attorney Kirrane said that a mounted <br /> septic system was installed because that area has an unusually high water table. When the <br /> mounted system was installed the grades on that lot may have changed, and that may have <br /> contributed to the issue due to the building height. He asked the Board to allow the building <br /> to remain rather than to dissemble the complex roof structure. <br /> Mr. Furbush said that comments have been submitted by any departments. He asked the <br /> Board if they had any comments before reading those department comments. <br /> Mr. Gould said that the Board has been very careful to inforce the height limit, but not <br /> enforcing the proper height now, especially with the previous petitioner, would be <br /> rightfully disappointed. <br /> Mr. Furbush read an email dated June 29, 2021 from Chris Gallaher, Town Engineer to <br /> Dave Morris referencing the subject property® He also read two emails dated February 17, <br /> 2022 from the To Engineer. <br /> Mr. Furbush also read a letter submitted by Weller & Associates dated August 29, 2019, <br /> and a letter dated March 15, 2021 signed by Steven W. Rumba, Professional Land <br /> Surveyor. He read a letter dated February 17, 2022 from David Morris, Building <br /> Commissioner, and an email dated February 17, 2022 from Evan Lehrer, To Planner. <br /> Mr, Dennis Balzarini, an abutter spoke and is in opposition of the variance request, <br /> Mr. Blaisdell noticed that a letter dated March 26, 2020 from Weller & Associates was <br /> submitted, and said the same as the letter dated March 15, 2021. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.