Laserfiche WebLink
recommends the applicant work with the Agent on the mitigation plan. He recommends a <br />close and issue with the 2 conditions of mitigation and a revised plan be submitted. <br />Mr. Colombo asked how many new piles, Michael Borselli answered 10. <br />Mr. Colombo asked how much mitigation is required, Agent said that will be determined at <br />another site visit. <br />Mr. Colombo clarified that the revised plan will have float stop inf ormation, Michael Borselli <br />confirmed it will be. <br />Mr. O’Neill motioned to close and issue with the conditions of mitigation with the <br />Agent and submit a revised plan. <br />Mr. Dalton seconded the motion. <br />Vote: 4-1-0 <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Mr. O’Neill; yes <br />Ms. Zollo; no <br />Mr. Dalton; yes <br />Mr. Colombo; yes <br />Mr. Smith; yes <br /> <br />In favor, 4; Opposed, 1; Abstentions, 0 <br /> <br /> <br />6:09 Mark C. & Kim M. Bush, 87 Lighthouse Lane. Proposed pier, ramp and float. NOI <br />Michael Borselli from Falmouth Engineering, Inc. presented plans. <br />Agent recommends having the tree issue addressed as soon as possible. Same as last <br />application, no Shellfish Mitigation Fee, Agent recommends mitigation plantings on the <br />upland portion of the bank. Applicant should work with the Agent for mitigation as a <br />condition if approved. He recommends close and issue with the condition mentioned. <br />Mark Bush (homeowner) asked about how to cut the stump. Agent suggested leaving a <br />foot or so above the grade to allow the area to remain stable. <br />Mr. Dalton motioned to close and issue with the condition of working with the Agent <br />for mitigation planting. <br />Mr. O’Neill seconded the motion. <br />Vote: 4-1-0 <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Mr. O’Neill; yes <br />Ms. Zollo; no <br />Mr. Dalton; yes <br />Mr. Colombo; yes <br />Mr. Smith; yes <br /> <br />In favor, 4; Opposed, 1; Abstentions, 0 <br /> <br /> <br />6:12 Premium Contractors Group, Inc., 49 Shore Drive. Proposed additions to existing RDA <br />dwelling and septic system upgrade. <br />Peter McInty from Engineering Works, Inc. presented plans. <br />Agent read Board of Health comments. No other comments. <br />Mr. Colombo asked if they considered an I/A system. Peter McInty said it’s a Title 5, the <br />cost of an I/A is significant. <br /> <br />Mr. O’Neill motioned for a negative determination. <br />Mr. Dalton seconded the motion. <br />Vote: 4-1-0 <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Mr. O’Neill; yes <br /> <br />