Laserfiche WebLink
too late. Most title searches occur with a couple of days prior to the closing. Therefore, I have <br /> changed the recommended requirements to just submitting a notarized affidavit to the BOH. <br /> The property is not within the plume of CS-10 but it is located in an area of former contamination <br /> so the VOC testing is warranted as confirmatory sampling. The testing for the PFC's has been <br /> done by the Military and they have stated that it is likely that it will be found in the groundwater <br /> in the ponds and the surrounding neighborhoods. Having the owners test for something that is <br /> presumed to be there,especially at$1,000.00 per test, is not a reasonable request. The guidance <br /> documents for PFC's state that the hazard to humans is ingestion and not dermal or inhalation. <br /> Therefore, I believe that the board's job of notifying the owner's that the contamination exists <br /> but as long as the primary potable water source is town water then the risk is minimal. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Kripani Patel moved to approve the variance with <br /> the following conditions for 65 Lakeview Drive: <br /> 1. Annual VOC testing be performed on the irrigation well. All fees associated with the <br /> testing shall be the owner's responsibility. <br /> 2. A notarized affidavit be submitted to the Board of Health that requires the annual VOC <br /> testing.The affidavit should include the fact that the owner should acknowledge presence <br /> and risks from exposure of the PFC's and that the owner has read and understood the <br /> EPA, DPH and CDC guidance documentation on PFC's. The affidavit must state that the <br /> irrigation well may be discontinued or abandoned under orders from the BOH,if required. <br /> 3. The spigot/sample port on the irrigation system shall be located below grade and labelled <br /> "non-potable water." <br /> 4. A health agent shall witness the connection to determine that no cross-connection <br /> between the potable town water has occurred. <br /> Motion seconded by Brian Baumgaertel. Roll call vote: Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel <br /> (yes). VOTE: Unanimous (2-0). <br /> 4. Review for request for Title 5 Variance — 19 Mercantile Road, Baxter Nye Engineering. Mr. <br /> Harrington commented that, this plan was reviewed during Site Plan review. The drainage, solid <br /> waste dumpster has been placed, enclosed on a concrete pad correctly, the Title 5 system is <br /> designed correctly and the floor plans have been reviewed. The use is commercial industrial for <br /> a construction company. The building will have a floor drain connected to the industrial waste <br /> holding tank. The septic system is proposed below a parking area so the Title 5 variance was <br /> added to the plan but did not have the Title 5 section reference(310 CMR 15.240(7). Office space <br /> is reported and planned to be added in the future. There is enough design flow for that. It was <br /> recommended to build out the SAS with additional capacity and/or add the denite to get flows <br /> greater than 600 gpd for greater flexibility in the uses of the building. <br /> John Lavelle, of Baxter Nye Engineering, introduced himself for the record and stated that he is <br /> representing Capeway Construction, who intends on building a 9700 sq. foot building. The <br /> building will be used for building cabinets,storage of the cabinets,and will include a paint booth. <br /> He commented that ZBA application has been submitted. Mr. Lavelle reviewed the site design <br /> plan with the Board. <br /> Mr. Harrington requested the Board make a condition for the painting spray booth to be <br /> permitted through building permit when it is proposed to be constructed due to the booth being <br /> a noisome trade. Mr. Harrington further stated for the Board to review the architectural plans <br /> that include the spray booth at a later date. <br /> 4 <br />