My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/16/2022 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
06/16/2022 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2022 5:00:28 PM
Creation date
11/9/2022 9:47:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/16/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There being no further comments or discussion, Kripani Patel moved to approve the septic and <br /> site plan with the Title 5 variance of the SAS below the parking area with the condition that the <br /> standard commercial property conditions apply to the property for 19 Mercantile Way, as well as <br /> a review of the architectural plans that include the spray booth at a later meeting date. Motion <br /> seconded by Brian Baumgaertel. Roll call vote: Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). <br /> VOTE: Unanimous(2-0). <br /> 5. Review for request for Title 5 Variance — 68 Mercantile Road, Baxter Nye Engineering. Mr. <br /> Harrington commented that, this plan was reviewed during Site Plan review. Comments at Site <br /> Plan were: A variance is required to install the soil absorption system (SAS) below the parking <br /> area. The industrial tight tank shall be installed according to 314 CMR 18, not 310 CMR 18. It is <br /> recommended to install an SAS capacity of 599 GPD, or add denitrification with an oversized SAS <br /> to allow for flexibility with future uses. Each unit must be plumbed for bathrooms. Each SAS must <br /> be vented individually. Plans will require BOH approval at a public meeting. <br /> The drainage, solid waste dumpster has been placed, enclosed on a concrete pad correctly, the <br /> Title 5 system is designed correctly and the floor plans have been reviewed. The use is commercial <br /> industrial for a contractors bays. The septic system is proposed below a parking area so the Title <br /> 5 variance was requested to be added to the plan (310 CMR 15.240(7). The only extra comments <br /> have is to separate the vents to each SAS and Construction Note #1 should reference the <br /> "Environmental" Code not the Sanitary Code, <br /> John Lavelle, of Baxter Nye Engineering, introduced himself for the record and stated that he is <br /> representing Daniel Hostetter, who intends to build a —9900 sq. foot warehouse building for <br /> contractor use base. He stated they will be meeting with the ZBA in July. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Kripani Patel moved to approve the septic and <br /> site plan with the Title 5 variance of the SAS below the parking area with the condition that the <br /> standard commercial property conditions apply to the property for 68 Mercantile Way as well as <br /> the condition to split the vents to each SAS. Motion seconded by Brian Baumgaertel. Roll call <br /> vote: Kripani Patel (yes); Brian Baumgaertel (yes). VOTE: Unanimous(2-0). <br /> 6. Review of DEP correspondence relative to nitrogen sensitive areas. Mr. Harrington commented <br /> that, DEP has proposed changes to Title V regulations that include a definition for nitrogen <br /> sensitive areas.There are requirements for new construction and for watershed permitting.There <br /> are two different ways for towns to address the proposed compliance for this new requirement. <br /> Each nitrogen sensitive area will have to meet the TMDL approved by DEP and the <br /> correspondence states there is a 20-year timeframe to remove 75% of the necessary pollutants <br /> from the areas. <br /> Chair Baumgaertel commented that the DEP's correspondence relative to nitrogen sensitive areas <br /> is in regard to the slow pace of some of the towns' actions towards wastewater treatment plans. <br /> Mr. Baumgaertel further explained the DEP's plans and actions regarding nitrogen sensitive areas. <br /> For areas that do not have a watershed permit in place, all new construction must put in nitrogen <br /> removing technology and all existing residents existing in nitrogen sensitive areas have to upgrade <br /> the technology as well within 5 years from the implementation of new regulations.The alternative <br /> is to have a watershed permit in place,which states within 20 years,75%of the pollutants will be <br /> removed by the towns that have obtained the permit. Mr. Baumgaertel explained that a <br /> watershed permit is essentially a way to define and authorize the use of non-traditional ways of <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.