My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/21/1976 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
01/21/1976 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2023 5:03:44 PM
Creation date
1/4/2023 9:39:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/21/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
minutes 1/21/76 <br /> page <br /> jean Brown covered. the high points of ;the D. .P o stuff.y done <br /> of Mashpee. Anticipated growtht mostly in residential areas, <br /> is the main concerns Mse Brown identified two areass <br /> FISCAL <br /> Every new house which has one ch34.1d. and is not assessed fo r <br /> $70,000 or more costs the town moneyO <br /> a) local share per pupil cost is slightly higher than ave ow <br /> age on the Cape. <br /> b) cost per pupil education is slightly higher than average <br /> on the Cape a <br /> 0 re MO-dential assessment of total assessment is lower <br /> tha other Cape towns* Howeve p compare to towns in Ma. <br /> of similar population, the in Vla,shpeeis higher. That <br /> is becuase other towns are mostly ruralo <br /> . UUla-Lively,, MasbPee is fiscally <br /> tax ollarwowi a higher, As yet q inimal pi tal improve,, <br /> mama have been made a Future capital expenditures will <br /> drive municipal costs ever higher. The i d1e school <br /> alone will increase the tax rate 0 , while attracting <br /> more famili so <br /> E Vl ROM ENT AL <br /> Development around. water bodies must be slowed and controlled e <br /> Water bodies, which contribute to the attractiveness of the <br /> town, could- be ruined through pollution due to proximity of <br /> septic systems to water. This could cause emigration of Tama& <br /> it i s around the ponds o <br /> OPTIONS <br /> o Brown offered the following options as lead.ing toward- so'sm <br /> lu tions: - <br /> 1 o Increase minimum lot size; maximum lot size would be 3 a s o <br /> Decrease density ato g grater bodies <br /> 3* Use bonus zoning as incentive to limit development o <br /> sensitive Jecological.) areas o <br /> 4* Increase commercial and. industrial zones as short range <br /> holding <br /> .1 d n device and, long range increase_ revenue and ern,, <br /> to am opportunities. <br /> 5a Increase seasonal and retirement housing <br /> 6. Encourage cond.orainiums in some areas <br /> 9 Encourage Conservation Easement B y.=La * This law can <br /> apply to buildable ubdi' i ion land as well as undo el a <br /> Ope d land and open space in cluster developments. An <br /> legal l t <br /> � is el.liihle. <br /> 8 e Take advantage of 40A Provision which allows for the <br /> hiring of consultants p the cost of which can be passed. <br /> to the applicants for site inspections. <br /> The meeting adjourned. at 11: 1 o <br /> Deirdre Greelish <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.