04/02/1980 PLANNING BOARD Minutes

Home Browse Search

PLANNING BOARD Town of M ashpee -PLANNING BOARD MINUTES : 4/2 f S 0 Co .......i3 ................................nt ' d w m P w-e...... ................... -------------- Attorney Dubin asked the board about cutting of trees and vegetation to which Mr. Terry replied the Planning Board has no jurisdiction and P th at would come under Conservation Committee . Therefore ; nothing written in the by-law law as to vegetation etc . Mr. Ken. Pecci asked what wrz ,:� ,.�� err stated that it is to the real teeth of the by-law was . Mr.. T stop building uildin on the bank. Mr. Pecci asked if the people could still appeal to which Mr. Marsters replied only. if they show hardship ; further explaining no earth whatsoever could be removed; no dumping; filling ep �' �� brought u the matter of cutting or dredging could be done. Mr.. Pecci g p of trees aga in and Mr. Marsters- asked how one wuld define the cutting of Attorney Dubin stated ople on Mashpee-Wakeby lake cleaned every tree. y P thing out . . .how. .how does one stopthe cutting of trees . Mr. Marsters stated a. person on can=�--t do anything that would cause erosion.s ion.. Mr . Wayne Tavares P • y should d b e :put in that stated that something similar to a deed restrictionP nothing under 6 - or 8 inches shall be- removed. Mr. William McKay questioned R-.3 to cluster zone to which Mr. Marsters replied no reason shy not though ' think it necessarily, applied to this by--law proposal '. Mr. McKay he di do t � PP _ asked if the Board would consider keeping acre zoning along the river front and keep a couple of hundred f oot. frontage so that we wouldn' t end p up with cluster houses 100 feet from the river ; but also ending up with these houses 20 feet from - each other. Mr. Marsters stated, no it can' t be -done, i ''f it is 75 ` , in width, the lot would be pie-shaped and very long sense, would be and because it would allow the depth needed which, in a s g . . � . and there is no era the can fill within 10 0 x no one could ever get a y y variance to do that after the fact because a hardship could not be shown. till slightly confused, it seems to him that 75 ' lots along I�r.. McKay i s s g y . river would not be in keeping with what we are trying to do . Mr. the P Marsters answered. . . in the cluster concept 'i t is state that we '.,MAYY.l we do no t`.'HAVE" to approve ; with other zoning , we would " approve, but" Mr .. McKay ,appreciates the consideration of the board to t o approve . Y P P wards conservation,ion but he feels if the board should change a year from now and we o g do n't'��t have a tight zone law on that perhaps the same .would be . r tees replied that i f one were to- look at the purpose of true. Mr.. �Ia s P . r zoning; the -whole purpose being conservation and the keeping intact cluster g, P P M especially in environmental sensitive areas , he so believes of open areas , P y ittin on the board would be aware of that . Cluster zoning that anyone s g is in keeping zn g wi th ith conservation- in mind. It could be possible to elimin. ate it , but Mr. Marsters really l doesn.'-t think it would be necessary. The first thing y i that you look at n cluster is the protection of the river. Mr. Marsters then asked for those in favor of the proposal Mrs . Delory replied the entire Conservation Committee was in P favor. Mr. William McKayin favor, but also in. favor of extending the line • asked for a co of wording when prepared that would be NOTE ,-, Mrs , De 1 o ry copy presented at Town Meeting.