Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br />Owners, BEC MA Properties, LLC <br />42 Spoondrift Way (Map 111 Parcel 127) <br />Mashpee, MA 02649 <br />SP-2022-51 <br />At the April 13, 2022 hearing, the Board had received comments from the former Town Engineer <br />who raised an issue that he interpreted the house project would have an adverse impact on the <br />coastal bank. The Conservation Commission had no problems with the initial plan, and in fact <br />issued an Order of Conditions to proceed. The Board had discussions regarding the Engineer's <br />concerns and voted 3-2, denying the Special Permit application. <br />The owner (also "Plaintiff" herein) appealed the decision of the Board. On August 25, 2022, <br />Attorney Christopher Kirrane and counsel for the Zoning Board of Appeals filed a Joint Stipulation <br />of Remand to avoid the time and expense of further litigation. <br />The Plaintiff agreed to submit a revised site plan for consideration of the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br />The revised plan depicted site improvements with two drywells to be installed. The Conservation <br />Agent submitted his comments to Plaintiff's Attorney and Town Counsel on August 22, 2022 and <br />was read into the record: "Thank you for providing the revised plans showing the proposed <br />drywells. I believe these should provide sufficient flood storage capacity on the property to <br />alleviate any concerns of flooding." <br />A Public Hearing was held on November 9, 2022 at which time at which time the following <br />members of the Board of Appeals were present and acted throughout; Chairman, Jonathan <br />Furbush, Vice Chairman, William Blaisdell, Board Members, Scott Goldstein, and Norman J. <br />Gould, and Associate Member, Robert Caggiano. <br />Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the remand hearing and presented the revised site plan. The <br />plan was modified to remove the need for Variance relief, and the only other non -conformity was <br />the westerly property line that was 4.5 ft., and is increased to 11.9 ft., improving that non- <br />conformity condition. So in all other respects the project conforms. The lot is less than 10,000 sq. <br />ft. by removing the coastal bank and below; the allowed lot coverage is 25%. Taking into <br />consideration that the original lot coverage was over 25%, and the lot coverage is now being <br />reduced to 24.9%. The project is consistent with what the Board would typically approve. <br />Additional measures have been taken to address any concerns over the impact of the wetland <br />resource areas, and Town Counsel was satisfied to remand this petition back to the Board to make <br />a determination. The Board would be making a determination of the revised plan with the new <br />drywells. <br />There were no more comments from the Board, and no comments from the audience. <br />2 <br />