My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
02/22/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2023 5:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/23/2023 4:08:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/22/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEETING MINUTES <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> FEBRUARY 22, 2023 <br /> Mr. Blaisdell recused himself from this hearing. Sitting on this hearing are the three regular Board <br /> members as well as Mr. Reidy and Mr. Ganzenmuller. <br /> 228 Wading Place Road: Remand Hearing ordered from Land Court Barnstable Case No. 21 <br /> MISC 000076 (KTS) dated January 5, 2023. Petitioner, Eprem Epremian requesting a Special <br /> Permit under §174-17.1 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze and replace an existing non-conforming <br /> single family residence with a new code compliant structure on property located in an R-3 Zoning <br /> District, and the Popponesset Overlay District, Map 112 Parcel 59, Mashpee, MA. (Owner of <br /> record: Eprem Epremian). <br /> Mr. Furbush announced to the audience that the Board received a 28-page document from Troy <br /> Wall Associates just a couple hours before this hearing.This did not allow the Board time to review <br /> the document. As a result, Mr. Furbush explained that the hearing will be opened and heard, but <br /> will be continued until the next hearing. <br /> Attorney Christopher Kirrane representing the homeowner for this hearing. Also present was Raul <br /> Lizardi-Rivera with Cape & Islands Engineering. This is a remand hearing from a decision that <br /> the Board approved for a raze and replace project under Section 174-17.1 presented back in <br /> January 27, 2021. The decision was appealed by the abutter and after hearing a summary <br /> judgement, the Court issued a judgement indicating that review of lot area and lot coverage be <br /> taken into account of all wetland areas as defined under Chapter 131 Section 40, and in the past <br /> did not take into account land subject to coastal storm flowage (LSTCSF). The majority of the lot <br /> is located within LSTCSF and as a result, was remanded back to the Board. <br /> The lot area is now being deducted from LSTCSF from lot area calculations. This upland area <br /> leaves 1,250 sq. ft. the old way the lot was 25,000 sq. ft. By deducting LSTCSF is existing and <br /> non-conforming as to lot coverage. Including LSTCSF is non-conforming as to the setback to <br /> wetlands which is zero feet, and non-conforming to the front setback of 24.7 ft. The original plan <br /> had a non-conforming issue measuring the stairway at 10.6 ft. The structure is now a conforming <br /> condition if not counting the stairs under this proposal. <br /> The Board had to make determinations for lot area,and lot coverage and set back to wetlands based <br /> on the deduction of LSTCSF. The setback to wetlands is zero, where the requirement was 50 ft. <br /> The calculation the existing lot coverage at 100% the existing structure is larger than the upland <br /> area. Under the old way the exiting lot area was 7% and the proposed will be 11.7% well under <br /> the 25% in the overlay district. The front measurement improved from 24.7 ft. to 24.5 ft. from the <br /> stairway which is now conforming. <br /> Attorney Kirrane reviewed the document and letter from Attorney Wall that mentioned that the <br /> house will become a three-story house. The house will be constructed on pilings because it is <br /> totally 100%located within wetlands. The section of the pilings is not considered habitable space. <br /> In the past, the Board has never considered the area under the pilings as habitable space, which is <br /> not considered a story. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.