Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> APRIL 26,2023 <br /> Sitting on this hearing are the four regular Board members and Associate Member,Brad Pittsley. <br /> Attorney Christopher Kirrane represented the applicants requesting to raze their existing three- <br /> bedroom home and replace it with a new code compliant three-bedroom home located in the <br /> Popponesset Overlay District. Also present was Mark Dib with Cape & Islands Engineering. <br /> The existing lot is wholly within the flood zone and is considered a non-conforming condition. <br /> The minimum lot size in the Popponesset Overlay District is 6000 sq. ft., but this lot exceeds the <br /> required lot coverage given the fact it is within Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage(LSTCSF). <br /> The lot does not meet the setback to wetlands, and is a non-conforming condition to the rear yard <br /> setback at 13.8 ft. where 15 ft. is required.Neither of the side yard setbacks are conforming at 11.6 <br /> ft. and 11.8 ft. The minimum requirement in the front is 25 ft., however the average measurement <br /> of the dwellings on either side of the proposed new dwelling is 20.75 ft. The existing house is 21.1 <br /> ft. and exceeds the average on either side which is a conforming condition. <br /> The proposed project will eliminate all rear and side yard non-conformities. The overall lot <br /> coverage of structures will decrease, and will become flood zone and building code compliant. <br /> Under the old interpretation,the lot coverage in the Popponesset Overlay District exceeds the 25% <br /> lot structure coverage at 30.1%. The proposed lot structure coverage will be decreasing at 29.3%. <br /> There will be an innovative septic system installed. The proposal includes a paved impervious <br /> surface driveway, and there will be drywells installed. There are no new non- conformities being <br /> created. This project is consistent with other newly constructed dwellings in the neighborhood. <br /> The Conservation Commission continued this project because they wanted to review the septic <br /> design and they wanted to review the retaining walls around the septic system. <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated he believes the Board can move forward and approve the project subject <br /> to Conservation Department approval. <br /> Mr. Blaisdell stated he is willing to accept the proposal and condition this project based on the <br /> approval of the Conservation Commission. <br /> Mr. Bonvie asked why the Conservation Commission continued the project regarding the <br /> innovative septic system. <br /> Mr. Dibb said that Concom wanted clarification of the retaining walls around the septic system. <br /> They wanted to see the profile and verify that the retaining walls are necessary based on the grades <br /> and separation of ground water. Both Conservation Commission and the Conservation staff felt <br /> that Mr. Dibb responded to their concerns regarding the septic system. <br /> Mr. Dibb said he removed an entire section of a landscape wall along Bluff Ave, and that Zack <br /> Seabury, Health Agent said that the walls around the septic system are designed appropriately <br /> and are required. <br /> 8 <br />