My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/10/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
05/10/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2023 3:49:51 PM
Creation date
5/25/2023 3:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/10/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />MEETING MINUTES <br />MAY 10, 2023 <br /> <br />Ms. Sangeleer, seconded, yes, <br />Mr. Pittsley, yes, <br />Mr. Reidy, yes, <br />Mr. Goldstein, yes, <br />Mr. Furbush, yes. <br />All were in favor to issue a Written Finding. <br /> <br />411 Monomoscoy Road: Owner, MT Guard, LC requests a Special Permit under §174-17.1 of <br />the Zoning Bylaws to raze and replace a pre-existing, non-conforming single-family dwelling with <br />a detached garage and second floor accessory apartment on property located in an R-3 Zoning <br />District, Map 124 Parcel 61-0, Mashpee, MA. (Continued from March 22, 2023 hearings at the <br />request of the Board). <br /> <br />Attorney Steve Guard represented the application. Also present was Raul Lizardi-Rivera with Cape <br />& Islands Engineering, and Jeff Metcalfe, Architect. At the last hearing, the Board requested some <br />final changes to the site plan relative to the zoning table and list the lot structure coverage at 100%, <br />(LSTCSF), and also the percentages under the conventional lot coverage at 6%, and the proposed <br />is 18.4% which is below the 20% requirement. <br /> <br />Attorney Guard mentioned that there was a proposed shed that was too close to the lot line. This <br />shed has been removed. Mr. Guard said that a building permit will be submitted for a future shed <br />and will be situated in the correct location. The other change noted is the second floor of the <br />proposed garage is not considered an accessory apartment because it will not be occupied by the <br />owner. This area would be considered a loft bedroom area with no kitchen. If in the future there is <br />a request for this to be renovated they will seek the appropriate building permits from the Building <br />Department. <br /> <br />Mr. Lizard-Rivera said that this is similar to the prior project in terms of the changes to the site <br />plan, and the architectural plans with the footprint. The prior plan did not show the actual stairs to <br />the house or the proposed garage, and the stairs to the loft above, and does not change the footprint. <br />The square footage is not changing. The proposed garage is not a true garage. It’s considered a <br />“parking area” underneath because it cannot be 2.5 stories above grade. The other change noted is <br />to eliminate the 220 sq. ft. shed because it does not comply with flood zone construction, and <br />setback requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Metcalfe provided the proposed house and garage floor plans with the color renderings. The <br />lower level plan shows an overhead door, and the second floor depicts a bedroom in the rear with <br />an open living space and no kitchen in this particular garage. The garage area is in the flood plain. <br /> <br />Mr. Furbush asked about the area above the garage. Mr. Guard said originally there was not going <br />to be a kitchen because it cannot be an accessory apartment. It’s just a bedroom with a sitting area <br />and a bathroom. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.