08/24/2023 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

mitigation (for a patio), and the applicant to work with staff on the removal/condition of the 18 pine which was seconded by Ms. Zollo. Roll Call Vote: Alexandra Zollo (Yes) Steven Cook (Yes) Marjorie Clapprood (Yes) Erin Copeland (Yes) Sandra Godfrey (Yes) Paul Colombo (Yes) 6 – 0 (unanimous) 6:12 87 & 89 Snead Drive, Robert T. & Linda J. Ellsworth. Proposed construction and NOI 43-3250 maintenance of single-family dwelling, hardscaping, landscaping and appurtenances. Representative: Self. \[Mr. Cook recused himself. However, there were still enough voting Commissioners.\] Ms. Zollo questioned the containment for the digging of the home’s foundation – the applicant has discussed this with Mr. McManus noting that the area was level and noted the soil is mostly sand. The applicant also plans to remove the material with no intention of allowing it to wash away in a rain event. Regarding the plan, the applicant wants to see what things look like once construction begins and wants to see how much “wiggle” room exists once construction has begun. (The applicant has been in construction for 40 years but is not a civil engineer). Regarding the septic the applicant will be putting in an I/A system. Regarding nitrogen and Regulation 30 (Nitrogen), the applicant has provided a nitrogen calculation in response to Mr. Colombo – satisfactory. Regarding the actual amount of disturbance (6800 sq. foot envelope) allowed to the 5,000 sq. feet or 10% of the river front buffer – 7,100 sq foot allowed. Based on this Mr. Kent indicated there was very little “wiggle” room. (The applicant noted, “You’re right. It is tight”). Ms. Zollo confirmed the septic would be an I/A system and it was noted the BOH would require it since within 300’ of a riparian. Ms. Zollo thought to approve there would just be continued work with staff. In response to Ms. Zollo, the applicant noted the topography of the parcel with little room for lawn although he would like some lawn (although it was suggested the lawn be clover). PUBLIC COMMENT Sandy Ellen (81 Snead Drive). Ms. Ellen noted the applicant has owned the property for 4 years with yard piles and equipment on the property and sought clarification when construction would take place – if everything goes smoothly within a month. The applicant apologized for the delay, noting construction costs have gone down and is anxious to get going. Regarding the barn, it may be built to hold equipment – or not built. Regarding disturbing pines, the applicant indicated that the trees would stay. Tony Venuti (President, Quashnet Valley Homeowner Association) expressed concern about runoff onto Snead Drive from the driveway. The applicant indicated the runoff runs onto his property – towards the house. Regarding that runoff, the applicant indicated that there will most likely be a catch basin. Mr. Colombo indicated that the driveway area is non- jurisdictional noting also the final plan would have all the contour grades and the applicant would work with staff to alleviate any issues with runoff if within 200’ riparian zone.