Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Kent comments included: most of the home and associated landscaping is within the <br />200 ft setback of riverfront. The garage and separate accessory dwelling unit, septic system <br />and portion of driveway are outside of riverfront. While the narrative states the Nitrogen <br />Nitrate loading, there are no supporting calculations, so that should be made known.\[This <br />was provided at the hearing and resolved\] Project meets the standards for development <br />within riverfront, including not exceeding the 10% threshold of area of lot within riverfront that <br />can be developed. Alternatives analysis provided in the project narrative. The plan does <br />lack illustration when it comes to proposed landscaping/hardscaping in areas around the <br />home within riverfront. If the Commission deems more details are required here, then a <br />revised plan can be submitted and reviewed by staff. Mr. Kent recommended to close and <br />issue. <br /> <br />\[Ms. Zollo, Mr. Colombo, and Mr. Kent discussed what was needed for conditions and the <br />high probability that the applicant would appear again before the Commission. However, the <br />consensus was that although the extent of disturbed area provided little “wiggle” room the <br />Commission could close and issue the order.\] <br /> <br />Ms. Zollo made a motion to close and issue with the following conditions: a revised plan be <br />submitted showing the landscaping and hardscaping and working with staff and the contour <br />lines need to be shown on the plan (related to drainage) which was seconded by Ms. <br />Godfrey. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Alexandra Zollo (Yes) <br />Marjorie Clapprood (Yes) <br />Erin Copeland (Yes) <br />Sandra Godfrey (Yes) <br />Paul Colombo (Yes) <br /> <br />5 – 0 (unanimous) <br /> <br />6:15 0 Nathan Ellis Highway, Town of Mashpee. Request to extend OOC 43-3080. EXT <br />43-3080 <br /> <br />Representative: LEC Environmental Consultants. No issues <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />\[The applicant’s representative was on Zoom. However, the audio was not available.\] <br /> <br />Mr. Kent read the applicant’s letter requesting the extension to the record. Basically, the <br />applicant is seeking a three-year extension to complete the project’s phase II. Mr. Colombo <br />noted that there was an abutter that was concerned about run off and Wetland’s regulation <br />application and appealed the initial order of condition previously – the DEP issued a <br />superseding order that was not appealed. <br /> <br />Mr. Cook made a motion to extend the order of conditions for a time period of three years <br />which was seconded by Ms. Zollo. <br /> <br />Mr. Colombo’s only comment was that Mr. McManus had no issue with the proposed time <br />extension. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Alexandra Zollo (Yes) <br />Steven Cook (Yes) <br /> <br />