Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Alexandra Zollo (Yes) <br />Steven Cook (Yes) <br />Marjorie Clapprood (Yes) <br />Sandra Godfrey (Yes) <br />Paul Colombo (Yes) <br /> <br />5 – 0 (unanimous) <br /> <br />6:09 108 Captains Row, Nicholas M. and Kathy M. DiGiusto. Proposed raze and replace RDA <br /> <br />embankment steps and deck. Representative: Macallister Marine Construction (continued <br /> <br />from 7/27 & 8/10) <br /> <br />\[The applicant requested a continuance to allow to obtain an engineer site plan – an engineer <br />has been retained\] <br /> <br />nd <br />November 2 @ 6:00 pm. <br /> <br />Mr. Cook made a motion for a continuance, which was seconded by Ms. Zollo. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br /> <br />Alexandra Zollo (Yes) <br />Steven Cook (Yes) <br />Marjorie Clapprood (Yes) <br />Sandra Godfrey (Yes) <br />Paul Colombo (Yes) <br /> <br />5 – 0 (unanimous) <br /> <br /> <br />6:12 33 Sunset Circle, Kevin and Suzanne Mulgrew, Trustees. Proposed deck demolition and NOI <br /> re-construction. Representative: Marsh Matters Environmental <br /> <br />The applicant went through the proposed project. The project is to extend the deck 6 feet <br />and a new stair access point. On the north side there will be new stair access as well. There <br />will be no change in hardscape with mitigation of about 510 sq feet with 4 to 5 different <br />species. No trees will need to be removed. Ms. Clapprood inquired whether the Agent’s <br />comment of the deck expansion being too close to the pond – Mr. Kent indicated that would <br />be a discussion point now. Mr. Kent noted that the ZBA application has been filed. Ms. Zollo <br />questioned the tree being flush with the deck. The applicant noted there will be no footings <br />close to the tree with the deck aligned with the house. Ms. Zollo noted that if the deck was <br />on the other side of the house there would be a lot less issues (e.g. getting closer to the <br />resource area.) and the deck would be better suited on that side. Mr. Cook suggested <br />eliminating footings extending the deck out 3 feet instead (cantilever). Mr. Kent noted a drop <br />off of about 1 foot. Mr. Cook questioned the compelling need for the deck and noted that <br />there were footings already. The applicant opined that the footings were not really something <br />to consider but agreed that the proposal was getting closer to the resource area and went <br />on to note that the structure was already nonconforming. Mr. Colombo expressed concern <br />about the mitigation given the shading. The applicant (given the species chosen) assured <br /> <br />