Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commission won’t be released until there is approval from the ZBA. Mr. McManus clarified <br />that there would need to be proof of application to the ZBA. Regarding the extension of the <br />chimney, the applicant indicated that some trees need to be trimmed but the tree (providing <br />shade) will be staying. Mr. Cook asked if there would be any foundation work as part of the <br />project. The applicant indicated that the foundation is fine, but there would be additional <br />foundation as part of the “bump” out but there is no foundation under the deck. (No digging <br />as part of the project. Regarding drainage in front to deal with runoff to the garage, there <br />are no plans. Mr. McManus noted that the structure will remain two bedrooms and noted the <br />standard language from the BOH. <br /> <br />Mr. Cook made a motion for a negative determination with condition of filing with the ZBA <br />which was seconded Ms. Copeland. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Steve Cook (Yes) <br />Erin Copeland (Yes) <br />Sandra Godfrey (Yes) <br />Paul Colombo (Yes) <br />4 – 0 (unanimous) <br /> <br />6:03 Megan Sue Abdullahi, 101 Meeting House Road. Proposed construction and RDA <br /> <br />maintenance of single-family dwelling, new Title 5 innovative alternative septic system, <br /> <br />hardscaping and landscaping. Representative: Cape & Islands Engineering, Inc. <br /> <br />Mr. Cook noted that this a straightforward application and well planned. Mr. Colombo had <br />no questions either. Mr. McManus made comments regarding the BOH for a three-bedroom <br />dwelling (Micro fast I/A system). The driveway is going to be pervious. <br /> <br />Mr. Cook made a motion for a negative determination which was seconded by Ms. Copeland. <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Steve Cook (Yes) <br />Erin Copeland (Yes) <br />Sandra Godfrey (Yes) <br />Paul Colombo (Yes) <br />4 – 0 (unanimous) <br /> <br />6:06 Thomas R. and Laurie L. Fordham, 428 Monomoscoy Road. Proposed raze, construct NOI <br /> <br />and maintain single family dwelling with all appurtenances and associated utilities, new <br /> <br />nitrogen reducing Title 5 septic system, landscaping, hardscaping and mitigation plantings. <br />Representative: Cape & Islands Engineering, Inc <br /> <br />\[The data from the groundwater was over 30 years old was the major point of contention <br />during the exchange with the applicant\] <br /> <br />Mr. Colombo raised the issue of the elevation from groundwater noting the data was 30 years <br />old (1993 test well). The applicant noted there were other test wells from 1999 and 2005. <br />However, Mr. Colombo noted a catch basin located right on the property line where he <br />measured the groundwater as significantly higher. The applicant argued that the catch basin <br />was not a leaching catch basin, and the measurement did not accurately reflect ground water <br />level. He noted that the ground water is controlled by the tides and current elevation was 4 <br />feet. Mr. Cook echoed Mr. Colombo concerns and noted an absence of a perc test on the <br />plan. The applicant again pointed to the 1993 test well. However, he went on to note the <br /> <br />