Laserfiche WebLink
In the packet are 2 emails between Alberto and Cavossa, the installer. This is the letter between <br />the 2 of them. Cavossa basically says that they don't know how the H10 components were <br />installed below the H2O since it was required and says that the town and the engineer would not <br />have signed off if it didn't meet code. <br />Mr. Seabury said that we would have to write up and have it notarized and put in the book with <br />a deed restriction on it stating that the purchaser hereby acknowledges they would have to <br />replace the septic tank and distribution box within 60 or 365 days, whichever the board decides. <br />Mr. Seabury advised that if there's second opinion and it comes back H2O just let the BOH office <br />know. <br />There being no further comments or discussion Ernest Virgilio motioned that we continue so that <br />the owner can get a second opinion. Brian Baumgaertel seconded. Roll Call Vote: Brian <br />Baumgaertel (yes), Ernest Virgilio (yes). VOTE: Unanimous (2-0) <br />4. Request for variance at 20 Bearse Road. A design plan has been submitted to repair the failed <br />septic system at 20 Bearse Variance. The system failed by regulation due to the fact it is a <br />Cesspool. The proposed design plan includes a 1500 gallon septic tank, with an H-20 Distribution <br />box to a 24'x12' leaching field consisting of Cultec C-41-11) units over a Biaxial Geogrid. The <br />variance request is for a 6' variance from the S.A.S. to the foundation wall allowing for a 14' <br />setback and a request of a 1' foot reduction to the required separation between the maximum <br />seasonal high groundwater and bottom of the S.A.S. for 4' of separation. <br />Mr. Seabury does not see a problem with this variance. Because of maximum feasible compliance <br />with the SAS being 20' from the foundation then it would be encroaching on the neighboring <br />property. On the separation to the ground water I feel that maintaining the 5' would cause storm <br />water runoff that would affect the neighboring properties with the change in slope. Since the <br />system is larger than needed for the 220 GPD flow allowing for more area of saturation I feel it <br />the variance for4'to groundwater is allowable. <br />There being no further comments or discussion Ernest Virgilio motioned to continue the variance <br />for 20 Bearse Road with the following conditions: come back with another set of plans for variance <br />for 4' to groundwater. Brian Baumgaertel seconded. Roll Call Vote: Brian Baumgaertel (yes), <br />Ernest Virgilio (yes). VOTE: Unanimous (2-0) <br />S. Request for variance at 18 Capstan Circle Mr. Seabury commented that a design plan has been <br />submitted to replace the septic system at 18 Capstan Circle. The proposed design plan <br />includes a 1500 gallon septic tank, followed by a KleanTu NitROE treatment system, with <br />an H-20 D-box leading to the 36'L x 7'W leaching chamber field. The variance request <br />are as followed: <br />1: A portion of the proposed SAS to be 9.5' from the cellar wall compared to the required <br />20'. <br />2: Install the SAS less than the required 10' from the front property line to 5'. <br />3: Install the SAS less than 10' from the existing water main in Capstan Circle. <br />State name for the record: David McNivit, here with Michael Oleksak <br />There being no further comments or discussion, Ernest Virgilio motioned to approve the variance <br />for 18 Capstan Circle with the following conditions 1. A portion of the proposed SAS to be 9.5 feet <br />away from the cellar wall compared to the required 20 feet. 2. Install the SAS less than the <br />