My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/26/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
>
04/26/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2023 5:03:21 PM
Creation date
12/19/2023 3:28:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
04/26/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Owners,Ryan Lenhart and Kristen Lenhart <br /> 81 Bluff Avenue (Map 118 Parcel 60) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> SP-2023-26 <br /> For purposes of this application and analysis said Bylaw is being interpreted by the Board to <br /> read: <br /> No pre-existing, non-conforming single or two (2) family dwelling structures shall be torn down <br /> and rebuilt on any lot unless there is an issuance of a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals. Such a Special Permit may be granted only if the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that <br /> any changes, extensions, alterations or reconstruction of the pre-existing non-conformities are <br /> not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than conditions existing prior to removal <br /> of the existing structure and that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking. In no <br /> case shall new non-conformities be permitted without the issuance of a Variance. <br /> SPECIAL PERMIT FINDINGS <br /> Upon review and consideration of the testimony and evidence entered into the record,the Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals hereby finds and determines that the existing minimum lot size, maximum lot <br /> coverage,front yard setback and setback from wetlands are lawful pre-existing non-conformities <br /> for the following reasons: <br /> The Board further finds and determines that the proposed raze and rebuild proposal will not be <br /> substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing non-conforming structure and <br /> use for the following reasons: <br /> • The existing structure was built in 1950's and is not flood zone compliant. The new <br /> structure will be flood zone compliant. <br /> • The existing structure was built in 1950 and is not building code compliant. The new <br /> structure will be building code compliant. <br /> • The rear yard setback and both side yard setback non-conformities are being eliminated. <br /> • All storm water runoff will be captured on site through the installation of drywells, <br /> whereas there are no existing storm water management features on the property. <br /> • The project is expected to be approved by the Conservation Commission. <br /> • Overall, the proposal will result in an improvement to the lot, and the new structure is <br /> similar in size, scope and character to other existing structures located in the surrounding <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.