My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/14/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
>
06/14/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2023 5:02:02 PM
Creation date
12/19/2023 4:07:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
06/14/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Owners,The Popponesset Island Road LLC and <br /> Jonathan Bernstein, Trustee of <br /> 16 Popponesset Island Road Realty Trust <br /> 12 & 16 Popponesset Island Road <br /> (Map 105 Parcel 264) (Map 105 Parcel 266) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> SP-2023-34 <br /> The proposed plan depicted the merge of the two lots, and the elimination of the common lot line <br /> between the two properties, and placing both parcels in common ownership. <br /> Attorney Ford referred to the zoning table on the proposed plan. The Ross calculation will be <br /> 42,500 sq. ft. and will become conforming. The front yard setback of the proposed house will be <br /> conforming at 67 ft., and the rear setback will be 63 ft., and the side yard setbacks are currently 19 <br /> ft., and 16 ft. The proposed side yard setbacks will be 19 ft. on the house, and 16.9 ft. from the <br /> pool. The current wetlands setbacks under the 50 ft., are currently 7 ft. and 23 ft. and the proposed <br /> setback from the wetlands is 7.5 ft. The proposed house renderings depicted four exhibits of the <br /> impervious area of the wetlands 50 ft. setback within the two existing lots as 4,580 sq. ft. from the <br /> top of coastal bank, as measured under the Ross Case. The second exhibit is the proposed <br /> calculation within the 50 ft. wetlands setback as 3,307 sq. ft. and the reduction of impervious is <br /> over 1,200 sq. ft. The third exhibit is the existing structures within the 50 ft. setback of the <br /> structures, of 3,586 sq. ft. and the last exhibit is proposed is 2,006 sq. ft., and is a reduction of <br /> 1,500 sq. ft. in that 50 ft. setback area. The zoning tables shows the wetlands setback shows 7 ft., <br /> and the proposed will be 7.5 ft. is not getting any closer. Attorney Ford said that an order of <br /> conditions was issued by the Conservation Commission. <br /> There is an increase in lot coverage under the proposal. The current lot coverage of the two houses <br /> is 22.5%, and the maximum allowed is 20%. The lot coverage of the proposed new house with the <br /> other structures,and the pool is 28.8%which is an increase of over 6%. However,the lot coverage <br /> for the upland on the site including the LSTCSF with the two existing houses combined is <br /> conforming at 13.7%,and the proposed house is 18.1%under the Ross Case.The new lot is 67,600 <br /> sq. ft. of upland. However, the lot area under the Ross formula is only 42,500 sq. ft. There is an <br /> increase in the non-conforming lot coverage on the site, but the Attorney suggested that it is not a <br /> substantial detriment under Section 174-17.1, and under the Ross Case, it is not more detrimental <br /> to the neighborhood. <br /> Attorney Ford suggested that there are benefits to this raze and replace. There are two non- <br /> conforming lots that will be eliminated and will become one conforming lot. But is still non- <br /> conforming from the wetlands, and the increase in the non-conformity of lot coverage. <br /> Mr. Blaisdell asked for the percent structure lot coverage for each individual lot. <br /> Chairman Furbush was concerned with the increase of the 28%lot coverage.He said that the Board <br /> has been trying to set a precedence to follow the requirement of the bylaw. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.