My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/14/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
>
06/14/2023 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2023 5:02:02 PM
Creation date
12/19/2023 4:07:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
06/14/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Owners, The Popponesset Island Road LLC and <br /> Jonathan Bernstein, Trustee of <br /> 16 Popponesset Island Road Realty Trust <br /> 12& 16 Popponesset Island Road <br /> (Map 105 Parcel 264) (Map 105 Parcel 266) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> SP-2023-34 <br /> Mr. Reidy read Town Counsel's letter dated July 21, 2023 into the record as follows: <br /> "Upon full review of the documents forwarded and research of case law on the subject of merged <br /> lot nonconformities, I do believe that the relief requested in this Raze and Replace Special Permit <br /> application is legally permissible,provided that: <br /> L The ZBA finds that the change, extension, alteration, or reconstruction of the pre- <br /> existing nonconformities (as they existed with respect to the two prior <br /> lotslstructures) are not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than <br /> the pre-existing conditions of the subject lots; <br /> 2. There is sufficient land area on the new/combined lot to provide sufficient parking; <br /> and <br /> 3. No new non-conformities are being created, unless authorized by a variance. <br /> 1 see that both lot owners are listed as "applicants"for the special permit, which is beneficial <br /> because, if'the special permit is granted, there will have to be a condition (as proposed by Atty. <br /> Ford) to remove the common lot line and place the lots into common ownership by recorded <br /> instrument. <br /> In essence, the ZBA should identify and itemize each nonconformity that currently exists with <br /> respect to the two separate lots, determine what nonconformities would be created with respect to <br /> the proposed usel structure on the merged/combined lot, and then determine whether any "new" <br /> nonconformity is being created with respect to the merged lot. If the new lot/structure only alters, <br /> extends, or changes a pre-existing dimensional, setback or other type of nonconformity, the Board <br /> can apply the Section 174-17.1 standard noted above to decide whether the special permit should <br /> issue. If, on the other hand, the lot merged lot/new structure would create a new or different non- <br /> conformity, the applicant would have to obtain a variance before the raze&replace special permit <br /> can issue. <br /> I don't see any "legal" issue with the application, and it appears that appropriate documentation <br /> has been submitted to the Board for its review/action. " <br /> Chairman Bonvie polled the Board for comments. <br /> Mr. Goldstein questioned the ridge height of the proposed home at 35 ft. and asked for a condition <br /> to confirm the height certification. He also reviewed the house plan "A201", and wanted to know <br /> if the front gable was a structure. Mr. Sidford stated it was a skylight window,and is not considered <br /> a structure. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.