Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JANUARY 10,2024 <br /> 33 Sunset Circle: Owners, Kevin and Suzanne C. Mulgrew, Trustees of the 33 Sunset Circle <br /> Realty Trust request a Written Finding under §174-17 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for <br /> reconstruction and extension of an existing deck to a pre-existing, nonconforming structure on <br /> property located in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 64 Parcel 28, Mashpee, MA. (Continued from <br /> December 13, 2023 hearings at the request of the Board). <br /> Sitting on this hearing are the four regular Board members and Associate Member, Brad Pittsley. <br /> The Board agreed to accept the late submittal of the revised plan,and will confirm that the changes <br /> were made as they requested at the last meeting. The revised plan date is January 4, 2024. <br /> Mr.Alex Lebedev represented the homeowners for the continued hearing. Mr. Lebedev stated that <br /> the engineer recalculated the lot coverage excluding the (LSCSF) Land Subject to Coastal Storm <br /> Flowage as indicted under Chapter 131 Section 40. The second issue the Board wanted to address <br /> was that the rear setbacks that were not noted on the revised plan. The original plan dated October <br /> 13,2023 depicted the existing lot coverage at 12%. The engineer provided the revised lot coverage <br /> at 16.3%,and the proposed would be 17.6%excluding the(BV W)Bordering Vegetated Wetlands. <br /> The plan revision date is January 4, 2024. <br /> Mr. Reidy read Evan Lehrer's comments into the record dated January 5, 2024. "Unfortunately <br /> the applicant did not amend this Plan as suggested by my last comments to you. It does not appear <br /> that the revised Plan removes the portions of the site that are water or wetlands as defined by <br /> MGL Ch. 131 Sec. 40. The Plan needs to identify the total land area that is water or wetland as <br /> defined in the above cited section and utilize only that portion of the site that is upland for the <br /> purposes of calculating lot coverage. The ZBA needs to determine the total extent of any <br /> nonconforming aspect of the project. This requires a thorough presentation of the site's existing <br /> conditions in relation to the requirements of the Zoning Bylaw. We are still unable to have <br /> confidence in the accuracy of the lot coverage calculation as shown on the Plan. I will reach out <br /> to the applicant directly to address this. " <br /> The Board has not received further comments from Evan Lehrer to review the most recent plan. <br /> Mr. Reidy asked the Board if there is any other information needed that the applicant requires to <br /> be updated. <br /> Mr. Reidy read the Conservation Department comments into the record dated January 4, 2024. <br /> "This project was issued an order of conditions by the Conservation Commission with a <br /> requirement for mitigation plantings due to the encroachment closer to the wetland(Inland bank <br /> associated with Johns Pond). Project will not adversely impact any of the performance standards <br /> for inland bank or Johns Pond itself and will result in an enhanced naturally vegetated buffer strip <br /> between the developed portion of the lot and the wetland/wetland resource area. " <br /> Mr. Furbush read the Board of Health comments dated November 27, 2024. "No habitable space, <br /> no comment. " <br /> 4 <br />