Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> Owners, Michael J. Tringale and Maureen G. Tringale <br /> 31 Keel Way, Map 120 Parcel 134 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2023-50 <br /> Mr. Goldstein reviewed the building plans, and there was no issues with egress requirements. <br /> There were no comments from the audience, and no more comments from the Board. <br /> In view of the foregoing,the Board determined the Petitioner met the criteria for a Written Finding. <br /> Upon motion duly made and seconded at the Public Hearings on Wednesday, September 13,2023 <br /> the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to issue a Written Finding to Owners,Michael J. <br /> and Maureen G. Tringale, Trustees under §174-17 and §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for <br /> a deck reconstruction, extension, and alterations to a pre-existing, non-conforming structure on <br /> property located in an R-3 Zoning District,Map 120 Parcel 134,Mashpee, MA with the following <br /> conditions: <br /> 1. The Board has determined that the applicant meets all the conditions of a Written Finding <br /> under Mass General Law 40A Section 6. <br /> 2. Site Plan— Prepared for: 31 Keel Way, Mashpee, MA. Scale: 1" — 20', Date: August 2, <br /> 2023, Drawn by: RAR, Checked by: TB, Job Number: 22133, Sheet 1 of 2. Existing <br /> Conditions & Proposed Additions. Prepared by BSS Design, Stamped and signed by: <br /> Thomas Jackson Bunker, Registered Professional Land Surveyor. <br /> 3. House Plans: Prepared for: 31 Keel Way, A-1: Lower Level Plan, A-2: First Floor Plan, <br /> A-3: Second Floor Plan,A-4: Exterior Front and Right Elevations,A-5: Exterior Rear and <br /> Left Elevations. Prepared by K. Marshall Works Design. <br /> 4. Any changes to the plans will require the applicant to return to this Board. <br /> 5. Conditioned on all Town Department comments read into the record including but not <br /> limited to the Board of Health and Conservation Department comments. <br /> 6. The Board finds that the proposed project is not substantially more detrimental than the <br /> pre-existing,non-conforming structure to either the Town or the neighborhood. <br /> 7. The Board finds that the application as submitted is not substantially more detrimental than <br /> what existed prior to removal of the existing structure, and that there is adequate land area <br /> to provide sufficient parking, and there are no new non-conformities being created. <br /> 4 <br />