Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Owners, Russell J. Spencer (a/k/a Russell L. Spencer), and Anne E. Spencer <br /> 29 Riverside Road, Map 119, Parcel 81 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> SP-2023-66 <br /> The property consists of a single story two (2) bedroom ranch style home that was built in the <br /> 1950's, that is located closest to the street along Riverside Road. There are also three (3) other <br /> cottages on the property which will remain, and has no proposed work. The existing two bedroom <br /> structure to be razed is non-conforming in three aspects. <br /> It is non-conforming on the northerly side yard setback at 9.7 ft. from the property line where 15 <br /> ft. is required. It is also non-conforming from the 50 ft. setback to wetlands because the lot is <br /> partially located in the (LSCSF) Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage, and the existing lot <br /> coverage is non-conforming at 32.36% where 20% is required. <br /> The property contains a total of 31,300 sq. ft. including LSCSF of land where 40,000 sq. ft. is <br /> required. The lot size is 12,100 sq. ft. excluding land that is within the coastal storm flowage area. <br /> There are no new non-conformities being created, and eliminating the side yard non-conformity <br /> from 9.7 ft. to 15.1 ft., and there is no increase from the 50 ft. setback from wetlands. <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated he met with the Board of Health, and his clients agreed to install an I/A <br /> system that encompasses the entire property,meaning every structure on the lot will be connected <br /> to the new I/A system which is beneficial to this property. His clients did not necessarily have to <br /> agree to this process because they filed this proposal prior to the change in the Board of Health <br /> regulations. The Board of Health Agent provided his comments and agreed that this process will <br /> be compliant. <br /> The project received a negative determination (approval) from the Conservation Commission. As <br /> indicated by the comments submitted by the Assistant Conservation Agent stating it will be an <br /> improvement to the existing site conditions. There were also positive comments submitted by the <br /> Town Planner. <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated that the proposed project is consistent with the neighborhood.He provided <br /> photographs of the adjacent homes that were approved in the past by the Zoning Board. He stated <br /> that the Board can make a finding under §174-17.1 that there are no new conformities being <br /> created, that there is sufficient parking, and that the proposed new structure and garage is not <br /> substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than what currently exists. <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated the reasons he believes the Board can approve this project. He stated that <br /> the new structure will be building code compliant. There will be a new I/A septic system installed <br /> that will decrease nitrogen loading for the entire property, and the Conservation Commission has <br /> approved this project. He also stated that all the proposed work on this property is outside of the <br /> wetland resource area. <br /> 2 <br />