Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> Owners, Russell J. Spencer(a/k/a Russell L. Spencer), and Anne E. Spencer <br /> 29 Riverside Road, Map 119, Parcel 81 <br /> Mashpee,MA 02649 <br /> SP-2023-66 <br /> SPECIAL PERMIT CRITERIA <br /> ARTICLE V -Nonconforming Buildings and Uses <br /> §174-17.1 Raze and Replace History:Added 10-15-2018 ATM,Article 16,approved by Attorney <br /> General 1-9-2019. <br /> No pre-existing, non-conforming single or two (2) family dwelling structures shall be torn down <br /> and rebuilt on any lot unless there is an issuance of a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals. Such a Special Permit may be granted only if the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that any <br /> changes, extensions, alterations or reconstruction of the pre-existing non-conformities are not <br /> substantially more detrimental than exists prior to removal of the existing structure and that there <br /> is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking. In no case shall new non-conformities be <br /> permitted without the issuance of a Variance. <br /> For purposes of this application and analysis said Bylaw is being interpreted by the Board to read: <br /> No pre-existing, non-conforming single or two (2) family dwelling structures shall be torn down <br /> and rebuilt on any lot unless there is an issuance of a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of <br /> Appeals. Such a Special Permit may be granted only if the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that any <br /> changes, extensions, alterations or reconstruction of the pre-existing non-conformities are not <br /> substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than existing conditions existing prior to <br /> removal of the existing structure and that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking. <br /> In no case shall new non-conformities be permitted without the issuance of a Variance. <br /> SPECIAL PERMIT FINDINGS <br /> Upon review and consideration,the Zoning Board of Appeals hereby finds and determines that the <br /> existing minimum lot size, the northerly side yard setback, and setback from wetlands are lawful <br /> pre-existing,non-conformities for the following reasons: <br /> • The lot contains 31,300 sq. ft. including Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage. <br /> • The lot size contains 12,100 sq. ft. excluding land within coastal storm flowage. <br /> • The existing maximum lot coverage is pre-existing at 32.36%where 20%is required. <br /> • The existing northerly side yard setback is 9.7 ft. where 15 ft. is required.Note: This non- <br /> conforming condition will be eliminated to become 15.1 ft. <br /> • There is no increase from the 50 ft. setback to wetlands. <br /> s <br />