My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/29/2023 HARBOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Minutes
>
11/29/2023 HARBOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2024 5:03:46 PM
Creation date
5/14/2024 1:17:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
HARBOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/29/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Woods Hole Group: <br /> Dack Stuart,from Woods Hole Group, was unable to join the meeting due to scheduling <br /> conflict. Mrs. Fisher presented findings to the Committee, and invited Dack Stuart to <br /> attend a future meeting. <br /> Seconsett Island Causeway <br /> The following recommendations were made to the Town after thoroughly surveying the <br /> area commonly known as the " Seconsett Island Causeway" : <br /> In the Short term,the Town is limited to maintenance work to keep the structure stable and functional. <br /> The Town should continue to place larger chinking stone(4-6"or 6-12")to fill the gaps between stones <br /> and prevent washout.The use of small pebbles/cobbles should be discontinued as this material is not <br /> being retained.The Town should consider staking in fiber rolls and installing plantings along the top of <br /> the slope/revetement to prevent material washout at the crest of the structure,which could require limited <br /> permitting. <br /> In the long term,the Town should consider reconstructing the revetment to modern standards <br /> (layering/fabric)that would prevent washout from storm and roadway runoff from undermining it.Woods <br /> Hole Group offers the following recommendations: <br /> •The crest should be at a higher elevation and a buffer zone could be created with sand/fill& <br /> plantings. <br /> •Toe stones need to be buried below the depth of scour. <br /> •The armor stones are likely of sufficient size that much of the material could be reused.This would <br /> save on materials costs reusing the stone so long as the engineering design analysis determines <br /> that they are of sufficient size. <br /> •Consider placing sacrificial sand on the face of the structure to provide a nourishment source. <br /> •The structure will have to be carefully joined to the structures on adjacent private parcels to the <br /> north and south. <br /> •Consider alternatives to the current method of dinghy storage,possibly by creating a structure with <br /> other structural components that can receive a boat,such as a rack. <br /> It appears that the portion of the revetment in the worst condition is at the low point(s)in the road where <br /> stormwater collects in the roadway and drains over the face of the structure.The Town will need to <br /> consider roadway stormwater improvements as part of this project to realize the full benefits.This could <br /> include installation of catch basins with drains that discharge through the revetment closer to the base. <br /> Raising the causeway grade will result in an expansion of the causeway width and encroach into the <br /> adjacent coastal and wetland resources,which will trigger additional and possibly difficult permitting. <br /> Therefore,it would be difficult to raise the grade of the road within its current footprint without using a <br /> vertical structure(sheet pile/concrete)to go vertical.A raised causeway consisting of a bridge on piles <br /> could also be constructed and likely would be a better option if the roadway needs to be raised more than <br /> a few feet from its current elevation.However,it will have to minimize adverse impacts to the private <br /> properties on either end of the structure.Also, a new dingy storage/docking solution would need to be <br /> developed.Costs to raise the road are very expensive and not part of this memo. <br /> The opportunities to capture and treat the stormwater runoff from the roadway are limited due to the low <br /> elevation of the area compared to the underlying water table and the lack of space outside of the adjacent <br /> wetland resource areas.The installation of cape cod berm along the easterly paved edge with waterways <br /> that lead to deep sump catch basins spaced along it that discharge into shallow subsurface leaching fields <br /> installed beneath the roadway pavementwould offeran improvement to the existing stormwat er treatment <br /> situation.The paved waterways could allow excess runoff that exceeds the system capacity to discharge <br /> towards the salt marsh as it does now. <br /> The drainage system's treatment capacity would be dependent on the percolation rate of the underlying <br /> soils and the size and type of leaching system.Capturing and treating the more frequent,less intense <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.