Laserfiche WebLink
the S.A.S and the estimated high groundwater, for a 4’ separation. He <br />states, this was approved due to a type of system currently in process and <br />adds the 5’ separation is due to the percolation rate being less than 2 <br />minutes per inch. The system offers nitrogen removal with a <br />sledgehammer allowing it for approval without a full board convening. <br />Motion is made by Mr. Livingston for the approval of the variance request <br />for 41 Shore Drive in Mashpee. Seconded by Mr. Virgilio. <br /> Roll Call: Mr. Livingston (Yes), Mr. Virgilio (Yes). <br />Motion passes unanimously. <br />3. Septic Permit Regulation Review for Addition of Erosion Control <br />Mr. Seabury introduces the topic, addressing persistent issues <br />related to dirt piles left behind after septic tank installations. These piles <br />often lead to stormwater runoff carrying silt and sand into infrastructure, <br />streetways, and stormwater drainage systems. Catherine Laurent, the <br />Director of Public Works, inquiries about existing procedures for handling <br />this matter. <br />Mr. Seabury explains that currently, there are no specific erosion <br />control measures in place, except for ensuring that the finished grade of a <br />septic system leak does not exceed a slope of 2%. To address this gap, <br />they propose the addition of "Regulation 16: Erosion Control." According <br />to this regulation, any septic construction work in an area with a slope <br />greater than 0.02 feet per foot must have an erosion control plan. The goal <br />is to prevent silts and sands from excavation sites from entering the rights- <br />of-way. If erosion or damage occurs within street rights-of-way due to <br />construction, the permit holder must promptly restore the road layout <br />within ten days, as directed by the Health Department or Department of <br />Public Works. <br />Mr. Seabury emphasizes that including the Department of Public <br />Works in the regulation language grants them the authority to enforce <br />these measures in the field. <br />During the discussion, Mr. Virgilio underscores the importance of <br />understanding Ms. Laurent's precise requirements. He seeks clarity to <br />ensure complete comprehension. Mr. Seabury confirms that Ms. <br />Laurent's written request entails applicants submitting detailed erosion <br />control plans during the construction process, if necessary. Approval from <br />both the Board of Health and the Department of Public Works will be <br />required. <br />The discussion concludes with unanimous agreement to proceed as <br />proposed. <br />4. Reorganization of the Board of Health (CANCELLED) <br /> <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL TOPICS <br />There are no additional topics. <br /> <br />HEALTH AGENT DISCUSSION <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />