Laserfiche WebLink
which removal will utilize an injection methodology. Once this removal process is complete, the <br />area will also be mitigated. Approval for the mitigation strategies and methods employed in the <br />project was obtained from Natural Heritage. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS <br /> <br /> Ms. Thornbrugh raises a query regarding the application for removing the phragmites <br />and whether there might be less invasive alternative method. In response, Mr. Gaudreau <br />explains that the proposed method is the sole effective means for removing the species. <br />Additionally, he notes that the trees’ vegetated root systems will remain in the bank to provide <br />ongoing support. This is a one-time process and will be carried out during the restoration phase. . <br /> <br /> Following up, Mr. Colombo seeks clarification on the types of plants intended for <br />placement in the velocity zone. Mr. Gaudreau clarifies that American beach grass and coastal <br />dune grass will be used, as they are capable of withstanding the harsh environment. He mentions <br />that at full maturity, these plants can extend between 6 to 8 feet into the ground. <br /> <br />There are no public comments. <br /> <br /> Motion made by Mr. Cook to close and issue with the condition of submission of <br />a signed monitored and maintenance contract between the property owner and a qualified <br />experienced consultant for all native plantings. Motion seconded by Ms. Clapprood. <br /> Roll Call: Mr. Cook (Yes), Ms. Godfrey (Yes), Ms. Clapprood (Yes), Ms. <br />Thornbrugh (Yes), Ms. Copeland (Yes), Mr. Colombo (Yes) <br /> <br />The motion passes unanimously. <br /> <br />6:45 <br />NOI 43-3283 <br /> 135 Daniels Island Rd, New Seabury Marina, LLC. Proposed marina <br />expansion and improvement dredging. Rep: Tighe & Bond, Inc. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kent explains the applicant did not speak with the Harbormaster or the Shellfish <br />Constable prior to the submission the application. Navigational concerns have arose during the <br />discussion and a revision to the plans will need to be completed first. <br /> <br />There are no comments from commissioners or the public. <br /> <br /> Motion made by Mr. Cook for a continuation for May 9, 2024 at 6:42 pm. <br />Motion seconded by Ms. Godfrey. <br /> Roll Call: Mr. Cook (Yes), Ms. Godfrey (Yes), Mr. Clapprood (Yes), Mr. <br />Thornbrugh (Yes), Ms. Copeland (Yes), Mr. Colombo (Yes) <br /> <br />The motion passes unanimously. <br /> <br />*At this time Ms. Copeland leaves the meeting* <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />