Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JULY 10, 2024 <br /> The property is situated in the R-3 Zoning District which requires a lot size of 40,000 sq. ft., lot <br /> frontage of 150 ft., and 15 ft. on the side and rear setbacks. The lot is nonconforming at 19,559 sq. <br /> ft. The existing lot structure coverage is 7.7%, and the proposed structure coverage will be 8.2%. <br /> The lot coverage is currently 23.8% and will be reduced to 25.4%. The lot size is 60,885 sq. ft. if <br /> removing the flood zone. <br /> Mr. Furbush read the Conservation Comments dated July 8, 2024 into the record; `Project as <br /> proposed will not result in diversion of flood waters or loss of flood storage capacity as all <br /> proposed structures are either pervious, semi pervious or allow for flow through of flood waters <br /> relatively unimpeded. No grading changes and no impacts to bordering vegetated wetlands or salt <br /> marsh. Buffer zone will be enhanced with mitigation plantings." <br /> Mr. Ganzenmuller read the Building Commissioner comments dated July 8, 2024 into the record; <br /> "In regards to the setbacks of the second story bump out and the swimming pool at 84 Punkhorn <br /> Point Rd. I feel both items required Variance relief at the time of application of permit. According <br /> to M.G.L. 40A section 7, since a permit was granted and no action to compel removal or relocation <br /> of these structures within 6 years, they become legally non-conforming structures subject to <br /> M.G.L. 40A section 6 and Mashpee Zoning Bylaw 174-17. Further, a Variance was originally <br /> granted for 174-32 Fire Protection which is exterior of the lot and does not impose an increase to <br /> area,frontage, width,yard or depth. Therefore, no further protection is required. " <br /> Ms. Sangeleer read the Board of Health comments into the record dated July 8,2024; "No increase <br /> in habitable space. Septic Reserve Area moved to new location. " <br /> Mr. Ganzenmuller read two abutter letters into the record that were in favor of the project. <br /> Chairman Bonvie polled the Board for questions. Mr. Furbush had concerns that the 256 sq. ft. <br /> cabana was increasing the lot coverage. The Board had a discussion and would prefer that the <br /> cabana be removed because it is increasing the lot coverage. <br /> Attorney Kirrane stated that the percent lot coverage is only increasing by 8%. The existing percent <br /> lot coverage is 23% by removing the flood zone. The pool is pre-existing, nonconforming and is <br /> setback 40 ft. <br /> Mr. Blaisdell stated that the Board has to determine if the application is considered more <br /> detrimental than what previously exists. He explained that the Board in the past has allowed <br /> percentage increases under the old lot coverage ruling. <br /> Ms. Sangeleer commented that the size of the cabana would require the same setbacks as a shed. <br /> Chairman Bonvie mentioned that the cabana could be removed from the application request. He <br /> asked for audience comments. <br /> 2 <br />