Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> OCTOBER 9, 2024 <br /> There are no new nonconformities being created or intensifying any existing nonconformities. <br /> There will be sufficient parking as indicated in the bylaws. This redevelopment will be consistent <br /> with the neighborhood. This project does not require any relief from the Ground Water Protection <br /> District because there is less than 2,500 sq. ft. of impervious surface. Under§174-80 of the Zoning <br /> Bylaws indicates any development which renders impervious surface less than 2,500 sq. ft. is <br /> allowed as of right. The driveway is gravel,not paved and is not considered impervious under the <br /> calculation, and does not count as lot coverage under zoning. <br /> Mr. Reidy read the Board of Health comments dated October 4, 2024 into the record; "Office in <br /> Basement meets Bedroom definition, considered 4rh bedroom. Septic is designed for 3 bedroom. <br /> Variance is required from 1000' IIA regulation, since house is in Phase 2 North. Variance can <br /> also be requested for 41h bedroom in basement with approval from Sewer Superintendent. " <br /> Mr. Reidy read the Conservation Department comments dated October 2, 2024; Resource Area: <br /> "Inland Bank, buffer zone to Land Under Waterbody, and Estimated Habitat ofRare Wildlife. NOI <br /> application was approved unanimously due to the dwelling being moved further from the resource <br /> areas, decrease is house footprint, and increase in naturally vegetated areas. Existing dwelling is <br /> part of the inland bank and concerns about bank stability, wildlife habitat loss, and tree die off <br /> from root disturbance during and after construction. NOI application supplied certified reports <br /> for each and commission placed multiple conditions to ensure resource area protection. " <br /> Conditions as follows: <br /> • Three year mitigation monitoring and maintenance contract with certified professional. <br /> • Weekly construction reports of foundation&retaining walls submitted to the Conservation <br /> Department <br /> • Stamped structural plans for retaining walls submitted to the Conservation Department. <br /> • Report any adverse impacts from water run off after a storm event. <br /> Mr. Reidy read a letter submitted from Mr. Daniels, at 26 Melissa Avenue, dated October 7, 2024 <br /> into the record, and a letter from A.M. Wilson Associates dated October 4, 2024. <br /> Mr. Furbush asked for the height of the proposed dwelling. Attorney Kirrane said that the new <br /> dwelling will be approximately 25 ft. from the existing average grade. The new dwelling is 2.5 <br /> stories. Mr. Furbush also asked for rebuttal regarding the questions from the abutter letters. <br /> Mr. Morris asked if a site plan depicted the existing average grade of the existing dwelling. The <br /> dwelling needs to be half the height of the basement. <br /> Chairman Bonvie mentioned that if the Board agrees to extend the hearing, a revised plan would <br /> be required. He said that Chapter 131 Section 40 is not included on the site plan. <br /> 2 <br />