12/14/2022 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes (2)

Home Browse Search

f y.: �'` �dill; wyl9 ...1...�9 JI+ITown Mashpee, :t� 1y fu r !ef -. IfG W Mi f ' 16 Great IV �1 ck Road North ,. Mash ee MA 02649 �n x�,f� Itl" IlllrGIs, Ifl,�'w 66k�ii7inor.r�r�,w6 MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 14,2022 The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals held Public Hearings on Wednesday, December 14,2022, at 6:00 p.m. in the waquoit loom at the Mashpee Town Hall, 16 Great Neck road North. Acting Chairman, lion Bonvie, Scott Goldstein, Norman J. Gould, Associate Members, George Ganzenmuller, Charlie Reidy, Brad Pittsley, and Robert Caggiano were present. Building Commissioner, David Morris was also present. Mr. Bonvie opened the meeting at 6:00 pm and announced he will take comments after each hearing. The hearings were not televised because of equipment issues in the conference room. 5 Sheffield Place: Owners, Christopher P. and Donna M. Funk request a Variance under §174-31 of the Zoning Bylaws to vary the side yard setback to allow for a 200 sq. ft. shed on property located in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 29 Parcel 150,Mashpee, MA. The Building Commissioner reviewed the shed request back in April for zoning compliance purposes and determined that the placement of the shed required a Variance. Ms. Funk presented a site plan dated December 15, 2021 that depicted a hand-drawn 10 ft. x 20 ft. shed showing a 15 ft. setback from the side lot line. The Board was handed another site plan dated September 30, 2022 that depicted the shed setback 11 ft. from the side lot line. The homeowner would life the shed located in front of a concrete apron of an existing pool. Mr. Bonvie reviewed the hand-drawn site plan dated Dec. 15, 2021 and noticed that the concrete patio of the pool depicts a distance of 30 ft. from the property line, and 15 ft. plus 10 ft. for the width of the shed which would be 25 ft. This would allow 5 ft. Ms. Funk said the shed approximately 13 ft. from the fence, but she thought it was 2 ft. closer to the fence. The fence existed since 2003. Ms. Funk thought the shed was rather large and doesn't believe that the shed would fit in between the concrete pad and fence. Mr. Goldstein said that the concrete apron is not part of the setback, and if the setback is 30 ft. there should be enough roam to place the shed. Mr. Morris said a neighbor brought this the shed issue to his attention. He said that the pool and shed do not require a construction supervisor's license. The size of the shed requires a 15 ft. setback. Mr. Bonvie also discussed the site plan dated Sept. 30, 2022 depicting an issue with another shed and fence located in the rear that abuts Town property. Mr. Bonvie said that he is fine with the request for the new shed, but he cannot approve a plan that shows an encroachment on Town property. A new plan would need to be presented to the Board depicting the shed and fence either removed or relocated. 1