Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> NOVEMBER 9, 2022 <br /> Attorney Kirrane said that originally the former Town Engineer at the time raised an issue that was <br /> interpreted that this would have an adverse impact on the coastal bank because the coastal banks <br /> were connected, and the concern with certain voting members of Board was the impact of the <br /> coastal bank. But the Conservation Commission had no problem with the first instance with the <br /> changes being made to the coastal bank, and had in fact,issued an Order of Conditions to proceed. <br /> There was a position of the applicants that there was no substantial impact or adverse impact by <br /> the project. In fact, the coastal bank could have been modified before even going to the ZBA <br /> pursuant to the Conservation Commissions Order of Conditions. Arguably that would not have <br /> even come into the play if just applying for the Special Permit, and that the work had been done. <br /> The Attorney believes that the conservation issue and conservation concerns were the only <br /> concerns that the Board had because initially a Variance was sought for lot coverage for the front <br /> yard setback. The plan was modified to remove the need for Variance relief, and the only other <br /> non-conformity was the westerly property line that was 4.5 ft. and is increased to 11.9 ft., and <br /> improving that non-conformity condition as well. So in all other respects the project conforms. <br /> The lot is less than 10,000 sq. ft. by removing the coastal bank and below, so the allowed is 25%. <br /> Taking into consideration that the original lot coverage was over 25%, and the lot coverage is <br /> being reduced to 24.9%. The project is consistent with what the Board would typically approve. <br /> Additional measures have been taken to address any concerns over the impact of the wetland <br /> resource areas, and believes that Town Counsel is satisfied with that and was remanded back to <br /> the Board to make a determination. The Board would be making a determination of the revised <br /> plan with the new drywells. <br /> There were no more comments from the Board, and no comments from the audience. <br /> Mr. Goldstein made a motion that the Board approve 42 Spoondrift Way Joint Stipulation of <br /> Remand Hearing ordered from Superior Court Barnstable, SS, in accordance with the August 25, <br /> 2022 Civil Action No. 2272CV00191. Decision of the Board dated April 13, 2022. Owners, BEC <br /> MA Properties, LLC request a Special Permit under §174-17.1 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze an <br /> existing single story residential structure and replace the same with a new two story residential <br /> structure on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map I I I Parcel 127, Mashpee, MA with <br /> the following conditions: <br /> 1. The Board agrees to accept the Joint Stipulation of Remand for 42 Spoondrift Way filed <br /> on August 25, 2022, and signed on September 27, 2022. <br /> 2. The Board finds that the revised plans submitted adequately address flood storage <br /> capacity. <br /> 3. The Board finds that the revised project meets the conditions of Section 174-17.1 in that <br /> there are no new nonconformities created; there is sufficient land area for parking; and <br /> the project is not substantially more detrimental than what currently exists. <br /> 10 <br />