Laserfiche WebLink
• Low-Lying Roads Project—Recommendation: <br /> o involve `Catherine' (DPW Director)to provide input on the <br /> Low-Lying Roads Project and the roads mentioned in the <br /> narrative. <br /> • Comprehensive Plan— Clarification on whether the narrative <br /> aligns with what will be in the Comprehensive Plan. An updated <br /> draft has been submitted to Ms. Uiterwyk. <br /> • Beach Nourishment—Clarification that "Town Beach"be revised <br /> to "Town portion of South Cape Beach." <br /> o Revise: separate restoration and regular nourishment into <br /> their sections. <br /> o The data table on pages 27-29 suggests that UHI speak with <br /> the representative from SPB to fill in the missing data <br /> entries. DPW has information regarding the missing <br /> "Placed Volume" data, and Harbor Master will provide this <br /> information to UHI for draft updating. <br /> • Issues and Opportunities — Suggestion: a more general statement <br /> should convey that various species are affected. <br /> Goals, Objectives, and Recommendations <br /> • Objective 1: Inquiries about the plans for both short-term and <br /> long-term goals. Recommendation: <br /> o provide additional location details, with specific emphasis <br /> on the low-lying road areas <br /> o add the specific issues at the archeologist site. <br /> • No. 2 —Bylaws and Regulations are already an implementation <br /> plan should the narrative be more specific to address the key points <br /> trying to convey to the reader or if it should remain more general. <br /> Further discussion on this matter will tape place later. <br /> • No. 3 —Recommendation: <br /> o Include the modification to the recommendation. <br /> • No. 4—No issues <br /> • No. 5—Suggestion: <br /> o revising the narrative to emphasize `Designing Stormwater <br /> Infrastructure for a Higher Capacity.' <br /> o Details about the existing infrastructure, along with their <br /> respective volumes. <br /> o The Committee reaches a consensus to prioritize elevation <br /> in groundwater as the key concem and maintains the <br /> existing recommendation. <br /> • No. 6—No specific locations are currently proposed. However, <br /> addressing this issue may require the property acquisition process. <br /> 3 <br />