01/01/2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JANUARY 135 2016 MINUTES Mr. Bunker asked the Board if they can condition the decision to install an H2O tank, and bring the manholes up to grade. He said the further evaluation are the two points, that the septic tank is not low graded and the leaching facility has no access manhole covers. Mr. Bunker said an H2O tank can carry heavy truck loads,and in this case would require removing the existing tank. If the home is sold then that job is done, and on the second point, the leaching facility is to install one or two covers to grade which is a Title 5 requirement. Mr. Forbush said the Board will require clarification in writing by the next meeting. Ms. Denise Bonoli, the Architect for the project approached the Board and said she knows the Board cannot use her recommendation. However, she works with Tim Grey, the project manager who thought the project could move forward after speaking with the Health Agent. Her understanding was the project could continue, and that the septic could be upgraded if the owner transferred the property. Mr. Gould asked Mr. Bunker if there were any time constraints. Mr. Bunker said no and Ms. Bonoli said it would be nice to have it done by summer. Mr. Blaisdell made a motion to continue the petition until January 27, 2016. Mr. Furbush seconded, yes, Mr. DeBairos, yes, Mr. Pittsley, yes, and Mr. Gould, yes. All were in favor to continue the hearing until January 27, 2016 with revised Board of Health comments. 28 Elliot Road: Owners, Joseph A. and Lenora A. Sciacca, Trustees, request a Written Finding under §174-17 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze and replace a single-family dwelling on property located in an R3 Zoning District, (Map 118 Parcel 117),Mashpee, MA. Mr.Kieran Healy,Land Surveyor with BSC Group represented the applicants for this project. Also present was Joe Colasuonno, the Builder on the project. Mr. Healy provided the Board with a detailed plot plan and house plans.He said the footprint is similar to the existing house and the lot coverage will be increasing from 18.9% to 19.9% lot coverage. The reason for the filing is that the current building is less than the existing setback measuring requirements from the street. The project consists of keeping the existing building setback to be less than the minimum requirement that is allowed by the Town. The plot plan depicts 21.9' of the existing and 21.9' on the proposed from the street, and the allowed setback is 25'. It's an existing 3-bedroom home and proposing a 3-bedroom home. Mr. Healy said an order of conditions was issued by the Conservation Commission, and plans submitted to the Board of Health were also approved. Mr. Furbush asked about the south side setback depicting 28' and increasing to 30'. Mr. Healy said that Conservation wanted it pulled back. Mr. Furbush wants drywells to be installed because of the flooding issues. Mr. Healy said there are drywells being installed on the north side, and the other will be on the south side 15' from the septic. 4