Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. <br /> OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM DESIGN <br /> P.O. BOX 720 <br /> SANDWICH, MASSACHUSETTS 02563 <br /> (508) 833.8856 <br /> July 28, 1995 <br /> To Whom It May Concern <br /> From: Analytical Systems, Inc. <br /> Subject: Upgrade of Stafford Ponds Septic WWT System into a Cromaglass <br /> Modular SBR Wastewater Treatment Facility <br /> During the pas+ two months, ASI has been exploring with Carl Grassetti, developer <br /> of Stafford Ponds, various Cromaglass alternative configuration options which lend <br /> themselves to the modular upgrade of the current septic system into a full on-site <br /> wastewater treatment plant. After investigating several options, ASI recommends the <br /> follow Option A as the most cost effective and environmental prudent for all concerned. <br /> This option provides both the Town of Mashpcc and the properly owners of Stafford <br /> Ponds with a modular state-of-the-art plant whose evolving treatment capability is always <br /> better than the previous growth increment. <br /> The basic concept of this option is based upon three situations where Cromaglass <br /> has replaced similar septic tank systems within the past six years. In the Central Columbia <br /> Schools of Bloomsburg Pennsylvania situation, for example, 1/4 of the 16,000 GPD <br /> average today is coming directly from an elementary school septic system. With this <br /> proven capability to handle partially treated effluent flows of septic systems, it is anticipated <br /> the Stafford Ponds septic flows would gradually be diverted until the whole septic flow is <br /> absorbed when this project about 2/3rd of its projected built-out. In this manner, the <br /> Cromaglass SBR 20/20/7.5 performance capability can comfortably maintained within the <br /> DEP required 30/30/10 levels of treatment. ASI's prcliminary recommendation would be to <br /> divert 1/3 of the current septic effluent flows when the 2nd SBR unit is added,2/3rd when <br /> the 3rd unit is added and all of the septic tank flows when the 4th SBR unit is brought on- <br /> line. Following this incremental "drawdown approach", it is possible to gradually lower the <br /> current level of septic pollutants to less than 1/2 of their current valves by the time the <br /> project passes through the 2/3rd (-234 bedrooms)build-out phase. <br /> Figure 1 provides an overview of how Nt(nitrogen) entering the ground water will <br /> be reduced as the total number of project bedrooms increase.This "drawdown profile" is <br /> based on two simple assumptions. They are <br /> 1) CA-120 SBR modules will be added at a rate of one for each 34 new bedrooms <br /> constructed and <br /> 2) the current septic flows will be incrementally diverted in steps of 1/3rd,2/3rd <br /> and 100% as the 2nd,3rd &41h CA-120 SBR units are brought on-line. <br /> The resulting sawtooth effect results when an additional CA-120 unit is brought on- <br /> line and wastewater flows are essentially the same as when the treatment plant operated <br /> with one less SBR unit_ First and foremost,it clearly indicates the environmental benefits <br />