Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br /> March 27 , 1986 <br /> Members present: March duPont , Chairman; FaUline DeLory Louise <br /> e Arman; Gertrude Ferriday; Elliot Rosenberg. <br /> Absent: E . Stuart Peoples arrived at 9:15 P, M, ) ; Dorothy • <br /> Studley. <br /> Advisors present : Mary Brown; Carol Jacobson; Gerald Sprout , <br /> Absent: Wilmont e rrow; Judy Mills , <br /> Ca.rta.l Development Cor (Holmes & McGrath, Inc . - Agent) <br /> To construct and maintain a. single-family dwelling with attached <br /> garage , deck and patio. To construct a. swimming pool , landing, <br /> ori-site sewage-disposal system, driveway and appurtenances . To <br /> perform grading, l o a ing, seeding and planting at Lot- #9 O ck v ay <br /> Bay. This hearing is continued from March 6 , 1986 . <br /> Robert Burgman presented revised landscaping plans , He stated <br /> that the patio will be brick set in sand. Pattern of drainage <br /> from patio at the level t the house and the patio surrounding <br /> the pool is shown alongit ry�:r ell locations etc. <br /> The edge of transition is the edge of the - vegetated wetland an <br /> is clearly marked on the plan, <br /> He said that the only time a, pool has to be emptied is for main- <br /> tenance purposes , approximately once every seven years . He com- <br /> pared the situation at Lot #8 O k ay Bay and that DEQE had had no <br /> problems with the fact that that pool would be emptied provided <br /> that at least a, week had elapsed since the last chlorination. Then, <br /> it could be pumped right out over the ground surface . He said that <br /> if that is a problem for the Commissioners , another dry well can be <br /> installed for the emptying of the pool. From ars engineering point <br /> of view, Mr. Burgman does not feel that that is necessary, <br /> There is a. great deal of concern ab out the extent of the lot clearing, <br /> the retaining walls and alteration of terrain. Erosion could con- <br /> ceivably <br /> o - <br /> ceiva. ly take the whole bank. Bergman said that the retaining gall <br /> is to minimize the alteration. He said that if the bank isn' t cut, <br /> there would have to be a higher retaining wall because of the dif- <br /> ferences in the elevations . � <br /> Ms . duPont suggested that there be less decking and a smaller pool, <br /> Mrs . Ferriday pointed out -to the client that the area is in a flood- <br /> hazard zone and the pool could be inundated -with salt water, <br />