10/19/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

ASHPEE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBER 1 , 1989 Commissioners present: V. Louise Beh rman, Chairman Pro Tem; Patrick Coffey; Joseph offey; Joseph Burns; Harry Desrosiers. Also present were Robert Sherman, conservation Agent and Florence ball , associate member. The meeting was called to order at 7: 18 p.m. 7:30 BRADGATE BUILDERS, 80 Noisy Hole Road, Continued from September 7, 1989. CONTINUED To NOVEMBER 2, 1989 at 8:15 AT THE REQUEST of THE APPLICANT. 7:45 BRAD ATE BUILDERS, 81 Noisy Hole Road, continued from September 7, 1989. CONTINUED To NOVEMBER 2, 1989 at 8:30 AT THE REQUEST of THE APPLICANT, It was agreed should any further continuances be requested, that they show cause. letter to be sent. 8:00 ROBERT SPUSTA, 40 Ninirt Ave. , continued from September 21 , 1989. Florence Wall Mood down. Chris Riel of IEP presented copies of the Locus Maps and attestation of ownership forms. A letter of introduction reviewed to date and an addendum listed work to be done and the impact on the wetland resource.. Section B to the right has had repair work performed by Mr. Spousta. Section A is s portion of the remaining seawall on which he would like to perform similar renovation work. The remaining portion to the loft of section A is in good enough condition not to require work at this time. He did not disagree with D.E.P, ls comment that the potential resource that may be impacted is an inland coastal bank. Dimensions on the plan are the sane as the seawall currently existing there. It was built in 1966 by Mr, Spousta and has deteriorated from natural ware activity as well as water craft induced wave activity as there is a boat launching ramp to the south of the property. An Order of conditions is being requested to permit renovations done, as well as the proposed on Section A. Pictures were shown. The new construction will contain Rebar; 2" diameter weepholes will be included for drainage. The footing will be " below the level f the gravel in the pond. Mr. Spousta advised the original was 6-8" but there was no Rebar in it which caused it to break up. Ms Beh rman stated there is eddying at the end of the wall . Nor. Rie l advised there is no evidence of erosion on adjacent property. If a concern, they would be willing to pour an apron. Mr, Coffey asked if they will be bringing in a Form Crew and was told it will all be done by hard by Mr. Spousta. He would be bringing in a 3000 pound single pour. Mr. Coffey pointed out the profile shows two feet below water level . * Spousta stated below water level , yes, -8" of that below ground level * Mr. Coffey stated it looks like i t is imbedded two feet into the ground.