Laserfiche WebLink
24 <br /> Ms. Warden stated that the BOH had to approve the installment of a denitrification <br /> unit. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky continued by stating that it has to be approved by conservation. <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to approve a denitrification system and an O & M on 6 <br /> Meadowbrook Road. Mr. Santos seconded the motion. Motion passed. <br /> APPOINTMENT: Jack Landers-Caulev 140 Captains Row <br /> The applicant was requiring two variances. The first is the S.A.S. is proposed <br /> placement 105' from the neighbor's well diagonally across the street. The state <br /> variance is for placement of a septic tank within 10' of a crawl space. <br /> Mr. Landers-Cauley began by stating that the project included the razing of the <br /> existing house and the construction of a new house. They anticipate that the <br /> conservation commission based on an informal conversation that he had with Bob <br /> Sherman will more than likely require a denitrification system. He wanted the BOH <br /> to recognize the variances as noted in his letter dated 10.15.01. Furthermore, if <br /> conservation does require denitrification he wanted get approval that one can be <br /> installed. He would like to come back to the BOH later on with the conservation <br /> requirement and get the paperwork going and vice versa. <br /> Mr. Doherty asked Mr. Landers-Cauley to clarify what the "85" was since he didn't <br /> have a copy of the whole plan. <br /> (Mr. Landers-Cauley replied to Mr. Doherty's question but I was unable to <br /> understand his response due to other contributing noise.) <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that he met with Mr. Landers-Cauley for a prelimary <br /> discussion on this property. It is a four bedroom existing to a four bedroom <br /> proposed on a considerably larger footprint. There is a give and a take to put the <br /> primary were the reserve area is and get outside of the 150' from the well. The <br /> alternative is to keep conservation happy by keeping the S.A.S. as far from the <br /> wetlands as possible at their request. The reserve area isn't mandatory. But, in this <br /> case it is warranted because it is a considerable change in the footprint. <br /> Mr. Doherty asked what the general groundwater flow was to this area. Would the <br /> affluent flow to or away from the well? <br /> Mr. Landers-Cauley replied that it would flow away from the well. The groundwater <br /> would tend to flow away from the well due to the location of the tidal water <br /> location. <br /> Mr. Doherty then asked what the trade off would be if they swapped these areas. <br /> Mr. Landers-Cauley stated that there would still be less than 150" so they would <br /> still have to come before the BOH for a variance. He calculated it at something 128 <br /> to 130'. He continued by stating that the problem with any of these plans is that if <br /> they knew all of the answers ahead of time. They would bring the plans to the BOH <br />