Laserfiche WebLink
this means and will not know the impact. <br /> The Committee agreed, if it this does not effect the ability for <br /> 9 � Y <br /> the school to be placed at either site, then leave it out. <br /> The permitting of the sewage treatment plant is mentioned under <br /> Schedule. <br /> The site is within the proposed wildlife refuge. <br /> Geotechnical : no changes. <br /> Historical Issues: an archeological survey is required by the <br /> State for large projects. The State has mapped out areas of <br /> concern and both of these site are in those areas. <br /> Tom mentioned the residence which was on the Center site was on <br /> the former DPW site, which has already been disturbed . <br /> Community Impact/Opportunity : the Committee agreed both sites are <br /> accessible for community use - take it off the matrix . Change <br /> the wording regarding traditional town center to " reinforce" . <br /> Remove the connection to the Police and Fire on the 151 site. <br /> Tom does not think there are any community benefits to the 151 <br /> site, it is a highway location. <br /> Acquisition costs : Mr. Franceschi will be sure the percentage he <br /> uses is correct. <br /> • Site Development costs: the Center site has a $250-300 , 000 <br /> premium, including water, capping the landfill and earthwork. <br /> Tom questioned if that considers the $100,000 roadway <br /> improvements and traffic signal at the 151 site? Off site <br /> improvements are not reimbursed by the State. The Noisy Hole/So. <br /> Sandwich intersection improvements were no included because they <br /> were proposed by the traffic consultant and are not required . <br /> Tom asked if permitting costs for the sewage treatment plant were <br /> considered? The cost is about $58,000 . <br /> The difference between sites is down to a very small amount. The <br /> Committee agreed not to weigh one site against another. They <br /> wi11 list the issues at each site and the range of proposed <br /> costs . <br /> Mr. Franceschi will prepare a draft of this revised matrix for <br /> the Committee's review at Tuesday' s meeting . The matrix will <br /> remove the plus and minus. <br /> **Ms. Ahlgren made a motion to adjourn at 7 : 35 p.m. Mr. <br /> Griffin seconded the motion . All members were in favor . ** <br /> NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING: Tuesday, November 30, 1993 at 4: 00 <br /> Taxpayers meeting at 6 : 30 <br /> Finance Committee meeting . <br /> Minutes submitted by Arden R. Cadrin <br /> � 4 <br /> 4 <br />