Laserfiche WebLink
Merry Sue seconded the motion. All members were in <br /> favor. ** <br /> The Committee then developed questions for each of the firms. <br /> See invitation letters. <br /> Joe asked if the firms will be allowed to read the educational <br /> program? It will be added to the letter that the educational <br /> program is available at the Superintendent's office. <br /> Bob Govoni was present and spoke to the Committee. He explained <br /> he is running for Selectmen and has sat in on these meeting the <br /> last two weeks. He is very impressed with the job this Committee <br /> is doing. Until tonight he felt they were going in a forward <br /> motion but tonight have gone backwards one step . Tonight I think <br /> you second guessed yourselves. Your ultimate goal is to ask the <br /> Selectmen to pick your beat choice. Your top two choice tonight <br /> will probably be in the top after next week. I don 't think you <br /> should pick an architectural firm to please the Selectmen , you <br /> should pick one that will benefit the town of Mashpee. <br /> Peter explained that some people on the Committee want to go with <br /> a fourth candidate because SMMA may meet the same fate of Design <br /> Partnership because we have not yet done any site visits. The <br /> consensus of the Committee was to go with 4 firms. Your point is <br /> well taken about not getting cold feet, like the Selectmen have. <br /> Mr. Govoni added this is the only Committee he has seen that <br /> researches their job so thoroughly. You should please <br /> yourselves . <br /> Peter said this Committee must realize there are a lot of people <br /> backing us in this town right now. The Committee should be <br /> reminded we can act more confidently. <br /> ******* <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> Bill Martiros said at the last meeting the alternate members <br /> voted on their choice of architect, if that is a problem we <br /> should rescind that vote . <br /> Merry Sue noted last week was only a straw poll . Tonight's vote <br /> was a motion voted on only by full Committee members. <br /> Janice Mills noted is it is nice that everyone on this Committee <br /> has a say. <br /> OLD BUSINESS ****** <br /> Project Manager. <br /> Should the Committee schedule interviews for Project Managers? <br /> Merry Sue suggested 2 weeks from tonight. <br /> How long should the interviews be? The Committee agreed 45 <br /> minutes is sufficient, scheduling 1 hour slots. <br /> Is there any firm that should be disqualified, before the <br /> interviews? <br /> Paul Griffin read the proposals and said legally no one should be <br /> 5 <br />