Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> MASHPEE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES <br /> TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25 , 1994 <br /> SMMA OFFICE, CAMBRIDGE <br /> Members Present: Merry Sue Ahlgren, Janice Mills, Bill Martiros, Joe <br /> Polito, Paul Griffin <br /> Also Present: Bob Fournier, Ray Bordwell , Ed Frenette, Phil Penelli , Tom <br /> Wren, Dan Solien, representatives from SMMA structural , mechanical , <br /> electrical departments , Daedalus <br /> MINUTES <br /> ** Merry Sue made a motion to approve the minutes of October 18 . Joe <br /> seconded the motion. <br /> Bob had a few comments: bottom pg . 7 Bob suggested concrete pavers for the <br /> courtyard, not stone. <br /> pg. 9 Rizzo, Woodard and Curren and Weston and Sampson. <br /> ** All members were in favor of the minutes as amended** <br /> To keep this meeting on track, Paul asked everyone to agree to limit any <br /> one person 's discussion of an issue to 2 minutes and total discussion for <br /> an issue to 10 minutes. If an agreement cannot be reached in that time, <br /> the issue will be put to the end of the meeting. Everyone agreed . <br /> SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CONSULTANT PROPOSAL <br /> Bob Fournier explained they received a letter from DeFeo Wait and Pare and <br /> they are willing to terminate their agreement with SMMA. Bob would like <br /> the Committee to formally vote to ask DeFeo Wait and Pare to terminate <br /> their agreement with SMMA. Good cause is the only clear reasons to <br /> terminate a contract and Bob said although there was some dissatisfaction <br /> on the part of the Committee, it is not clearly cause. <br /> ** Janice made a motion to request the agreement between DeFeo Wait <br /> and Pare and Symmes Maini and McKee be terminated. Merry Sue <br /> seconded the motion. <br /> Discussion: <br /> Paul asked the motion be amended to say it is a non binding vote by the <br /> Committee because they don't have any legal right to terminate a contract. <br /> ** Janice amended the motion to ask the agreement be terminated but <br /> this is a non binding vote of the Committee. Merry Sue seconded <br /> the motion. <br /> The Committee agreed to discuss SMMA's proposal for a new consultant before <br /> voting on this motion. <br /> SMMA invited 3 candidates to submit proposals: Rizzo, Woodard and Curran <br /> and Weston and Sampson. Woodard and Curran and Weston and Sampson attended <br /> a meeting, with SMMA, at the office of DWP to review the work they had <br /> completed to date. <br /> Based on review of the proposals and the fee proposals presented, SMMA is <br /> recommending Woodard and Curran . Bob added that time is of the essence. <br /> DEP legally can take up to 1 year to approve the plant. <br /> He said there is no more impact to the project schedule then if the <br /> 1 <br />